英语论文网

/> 3.3.1Similarity Determination Example. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53
3.3.2Similarity Determination as Part of the Overall IDSDM Operation 58
4EVALUATION AND FUTURE WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61
4.1Evaluation of Matching and Retrieval Metric . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62
4.1.1Initial Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62
4.1.2Phase Two of Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70
4.2Future Work for IDSDM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76
4.2.1Improving Similarity Determination and Case Retrieval Perfor-mance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76
4.2.2The Future of IDSDM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79
5RELATED RESEARCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84
5.1CBR Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85
5.1.1General CBR Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85
5.1.2CBR in Medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89
5.2Diabetes Research and Technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93
5.2.1Diabetes Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93
5.2.2Commercially Available Diabetes Care Technology. . . . . .96
6SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103
List of Figures
2.1weeks of patient glucose data.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24
2.2DataGraph visualization program. (Wesley Miller) . . . . . . . . . . .29
2.3Data entry screen on project website. (Anthony Maimone) . . . . . .30
3.1Case structure hierarchy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42
3.2Comparison functions used in the similarity metric. . . . . . . . . . .47
3.3Pseudo-code representation of IDSDM similarity determination mod-ule (Part 1 of 2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
3.4Pseudo-code representation of IDSDM similarity determination mod-ule (Part 2 of 2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
3.5Pseudo-code representation of Boolean valued features. . . . . . . . .51
3.6Pseudo-code representation of comparison of enumerated type valued features. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51
3.7Brief description of input case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54
3.8Brief description of Case 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55
3.9Brief description of Case 49. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55
3.10 Software level overview of IDSDM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
4.1Sample evaluation form, page 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65
4.2Sample evaluation form, page 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66
4.3Similarity of best matching case to input case. . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
4.4Usefulness of best matching solution to the input problem. . . . . . .67
4.5Matching case most similar to input case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
4.6Usefulness of returned solution by score range. . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
4.7Sample evaluation form used for the second phase of performance testing. 71
4.8Similarity of returned case to input