英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

Disregard of Corporate Personality drawbacks——公司法人格否认制度的弊端

论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2013-08-09编辑:yangcheng点击率:5429

论文字数:2789论文编号:org201308091134049719语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文

关键词:公司法company law企业管理法律

摘要:虽然国务院和最高法院相继发布的行政法规和司法解释具备了公司法人人格否认的法理精神,且在新《公司法》颁布后,公司法人人格否认制度已经在我国的公司立法当中得以确立,但我国公司法人格否认制度仍存在弊端.

我国(中国)的公司法修订后,关于公司法人人格否认的责任承担形式,规定为连带责任。公司法第20条第3小条说:“公司股东滥用公司法人独立地位和股东有限责任,逃避债务,严重损害公司债权人利益的,应当对公司债务承担连带责任。

China's "Company Law" amendment, on the responsibility of Disregard of Corporate Personality bear form, defined as joint and several liability. "Company Law" Article 20, paragraph 3: "abuse of corporate shareholders independent status and limited liability of shareholders, to escape debt, serious damage to the interests of the creditors of the company shall be jointly and severally liable for the company's debt." Section 64 provides that: "a person shareholders of a limited liability company can not prove that the property independent from his own property, the debts of the company shall be jointly and severally liable. "so-called joint and several liability in civil law theory, mainly refers to two or more parties are assumed debt, respectively All liability settled, the creditor is entitled to any one, several or all of the parties to put forward a request to perform the debt, when a party fulfilling that obligation, the right to require the other party jointly and severally liable to pay its share shall bear . (Footnote - 'Ma Ju, I extend full:' Civil original theory ", Law Press, 2005 edition, page 160.) Based on the principle to understand the new" Company Law "Article 20 provides that when the creditor as the shareholders misuse of company independent personality behavior or limited liability damage, you can either ask the shareholders accept full responsibility, you can also require the company to take full responsibility. Shareholders or the company has assumed full responsibility alone, you can request the other party shall bear its share of commitments. However, the question appears, the first is how to determine the shareholders and the company's share of responsibility; Second, if the company's independent personality is a shareholder abuse, and also require the company jointly and severally liable together, then the other shareholders do not abuse the interests of corporate personality, it will be jointly and severally liable because the company compromised.


Second, corporate personality denial system applicable standards are not uniform


公司法第20条的规定的内容和许多国家对于公司法人人格否认制度的规定一样,没有确立使用公司法人人格否认制度的统一标准,对于何为滥用股东权利,何为滥用公司法人独立地位和股东有限责任,没有做出很好的解释。

New "Company Law" provisions of Article 20, and many countries in disregard of corporate personality system requires the same, does not establish corporate personality denial system using a unified standard for what is abuse of shareholders' rights, what is the misuse of corporate independent status and limited liability of shareholders, did not make a very good explanation. Of course, the reason is that the question itself is not able to pass legislation to establish a simple standard, and our country is not the case law, it is impossible to determine the applicable through case Disregard of Corporate Personality System in specific circumstances. For the company itself or the shareholders, there is no certain standard, meaning no exact rules of conduct, how to judge their own behavior is a violation of the law to become a doubt; Meanwhile, a legal gap for the misuse of corporate and independent status limited liability of shareholders to create favorable conditions. For creditors of the company, there is no uniform standard, which means the creditor can not论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/3 页首页上一页123下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非