英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

评估取消制度或者保留制度的辩论 [5]

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-10-03编辑:zcm84984点击率:17227

论文字数:5955论文编号:org201409281320035540语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文

关键词:保留制度Law Essay取消制度逻辑推敲

摘要:本文是旨在变量评估取消制度或者保留制度的辩论,增乳艾礼富文德尔福尔摩斯所说:“历史的篇章是值得用逻辑推敲的。对历史的回顾保持沉默的权利,在不同的时间点上拥有的这一特权,应该对该位置提供一些观点。”拉丁词“‘nemo tenetur prodere seipsum”意味着追溯到罗马时代,没有人能够在公共场所背叛他自己。

n of a law in force, and

2) No person shall be tried for the same offence more than once nor be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.

This draft provision was adopted by the sub committee on 15th April 1947 and incorporated in this report to the Advisory Committee as Clause 27. When the Advisory Committee took, up this clause for consideration on 22nd April 1947, Rajagopalachari remarked that it was not necessary to put in the usual principles of criminal law, which the clause embodied, as fundamental rights in the Constitution. Shri Munshi replied to it by saying that while it was true that generally criminal laws were passed by the Legislature, the clause was intended against a specific grievance. An act that was not an offence at the time it was committed might after six months or so be regarded as an offence by a Legislature by now. Without further discussion, the Advisory Committee adopted the clause as recommended by the sub committee and embodied it as Clause 20 of the annexure to its interim report to the Constituent Assembly. The Drafting Committee then considered Clause 26 of the Constitutional Adviser's Draft Constitution on November 1, 1947 and held that the intention of the second part of Sub-clause (2) was only to prohibit compulsion of an accused to be a witness against himself and if that intention was made clear, the additional words proposed by the Constitutional Adviser would not be necessary. The committee split up Sub-clause (2) into two independent clauses - the farmer dealing with double jeopardy and the latter with self-incrimination. So amended, the provision appeared in the Draft Constitution as Article 14, which is as follows:

1. No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law at the time of the commission of the offence.

2. No person shall be punished for the same offence more than once.

3. No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be witness against himself.

As aforesaid the matter was then debated in the Constituent Assembly and after considering the brief reply to the debate by Dr. V.R. Ambedkar, Chairman of the Constuent Assembly, the assembly accepted the amendment moved by Krishnamachari and Thakurdas Bhargava and ultimately the draft articles as amended was included in the draft Constitution. Later on, at the revisional stage the Drafting Committee renumbered it as Article 20 and it reads thus:

1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.

2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.

3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

The 180th Law commission report has enumerated various facets of the right to silence namely: -

Burden on the prosecution to prove that the accused is guilty

Presumption of innocence of the accused till proven guilty

Right of the accused 论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。
英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非