英语论文网

) study lends empirical support to the notion like caretaker speech, that classroom input may facilitate acquisition. Henzl(1979) compares thelanguage that teachers use when teaching pupils of different levels of proficiency. Heobserves adjustments in pronunciation, in lexis and in grammar. These modificationsmirror those observed in foreigner talk. A study by Hamayan and Tucker (1980)extends research in language classroom input considerably by examining the effect ofclassroom input on learners’ production. The investigators find that the frequency ofoccurrence in the teachers’ classroom speech of nine structures in French correlatedsignificantly with the frequency with which these structures are produced by thelearners in a story-retelling task.

Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework.......... 30-36
    3.1 The Input Hypothesis .........30-31
    3.2 The Interaction Hypothesis......... 31-33
    3.3 The Output Hypothesis......... 33-34
    3.4 Summary......... 34-36
Chapter 4 Methodology......... 36-43
    4.1 Research Questions......... 36
    4.2 Participants .........36-37
    4.3 Lesson Types......... 37
    4.4 Research Methods.........37-40
    4.5 Research Procedures.........40-43
        4.5.1 The Audio-Recording Proces......... 40-41
        4.5.2 Questionnaire Survey Process......... 41
        4.5.3 The Transcription Process......... 41-42
        4.5.4 The Analysis Process .........42-43
Chapter 5 Data Presentation......... 43-52
    5.1 The Results of Recorded Data .........43-46
        5.1.1 The Results of Question Types......... 43-44
        5.1.2 The Results of Interactional......... 44-45
        5.1.3 The Results of Feedback .........45-46
        5.1.4 The Results of Teacher Talk Time......... 46
5.2 The Results of Questionnaire Survey......... 46-52

Conclusion

It should be acknowledged that this present study is far from satisfactory. First,the total number of teachers observed is relatively small while only 6 teachers serve asthe research subjects in this study. In addition, these six teachers have differentteaching experiences and teaching styles. In this study, the author doesn’t take thesefactors into consideration. Therefore, the results of the present study are limited. Thefuture study should pay more attention to these factors in order to make the researchresults more valid.Second, the data presented in this thesis are only some basic descriptive statisticslike frequency, percentage, etc. The significance of the data’s differences is not tested.Third, by virtue of practical difficulties, the data in the present study have beencollected only by using recording pen as the major research instrument. The authorhas observed that non-verbal behaviors (such as a light nod, body language, the facialexpression, etc.) also affect classroom interaction and even change students’beh本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。