英语论文网

自由的概念是理解康德哲学的关键，而关键是他整个哲学理论。康德的自由讨论在形而上的层面，其中的目的是通过自由地反映人的性格。从他的角度来看，以前两种关于自由的理解是感性与知性，和前哲学家缺乏了解它实际的知识，谁处理的感知和智力作为整体的合理性，从而导致自然与自由的悖论。康德假设，只有当我们依靠我们自己的原因，我们是自由的。我认为康德是正确的关于自由的，他的意见对我们的善，恶的理解指导意义。
The concept of freedom is the key to understanding the philosophy of Kant , but the key is his whole philosophy . Kant's discussion of freedom in the metaphysical level, which is designed to reflect the people through free personality . From his perspective, the two previous understanding of freedom is emotional and intellectual, philosopher and former lack of understanding of its actual knowledge , perception and intelligence who treated rationality as a whole , leading to the paradox of nature and freedom . Kant assumed that only when we rely on our own reasons , we are free . I think that Kant was right about freedom , his comments on our good and evil understanding guidance.

自由康德的观点表明，两个水平应满足在自由的研究，这是自然事实层面和价值层面。在自然事实层面，利用自然和改造社会更加理性和自由人从自然和社会的约束是主要的事情需要关注。在这个层面上，自然是更接近与人的物质需求和精神享受，给人类的极限。
Kant's view of freedom shows that the two should meet at the level of freedom of research , which is the fact that the level and value of the natural level . In fact the natural level, the use of natural and transformation of society more rational and free people from the constraints of nature and society are the main things you need attention. At this level , is naturally closer to the people's material needs and spiritual enjoyment, to the human limit. External pursuit of human development of science and technology , and to establish a rational social system , but not enough, because the external pursuit of freedom requires a certain interest from the beginning , has targeted to achieve a certain experience of the object . Thus , morality is not guaranteed, and the maximum value of existence did not materialize, so the social construction of science and technology and institutional development , trapped and lost. Therefore , it is crucial to note that the value of the level of internal freedom . How internal freedom and human concerns go beyond the constraints of natural necessity , and seek the ultimate and the best value and significance level . Obviously, the internal freedom is greater than the external freedom , because Aristotle believed that slavery is an appropriate period of time human social roles .

In ten episodes of Zander , he made opposition to Aristotle's view of freedom , because he believed that slavery was an appropriate number of people at a time of social roles . In Aristotle's view , justice means everyone what he deserved were obtained , but the problem here is that on this basis we measure what a person should get. Aristotle did not take sufficient space exists between individual freedom, and tension with his view of Kant's theory . Utilitarian assumption , no matter what created the greatest amount of happiness , this is the right thing, and liberals could not reach an agreement , in their view , it is not a violation of the rights of others , no matter how much happiness it prod本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。