英语论文网

an revises Zeng’s criteria, Ding holds the view that thethird standard is unnecessary to testify whether a verb is an ergative verb. Song Yayunmaintains that ergative verbs could transfer between “NP1+V+NP2” and “NP2+V”,and when the verb is used in the pattern of “NP1+V+NP2”, the sentence has thecausative meaning, and when the verb is used in “NP2+V”, the sentence has thepassive meaning(356-359) .
..........

1.2 Introduction of Chinese Ergative Construction
The transitive and intransitive member of the ergative pair are referred to asergative transitive and intransitive respectively (Mstsuzaki, What is Chinese ergative construction? Just as the name implies, the verb inChinese ergative constructions should be an ergative verb. An ergative construction isone in which an expression on which normally functions as the object of a giventransitive verb is used intransitively as the subject of the verb.(Radford, 374). Ergativeconstructions also have some peculiar features.Firstly, ergative constructions take the active form but express a passive meaning,just like middle constructions.Secondly, the subject of the ergative construction is the patient of the verb, whichmeans the grammatical subject of the construction undergoes change-of-state which istriggered by the verb.Thirdly, verbs in ergative constructions never appear in the present tense, becauseergative constructions always describe eventive things.According to the comprehension of ergative verbs and ergative constructions, it isclear that (2) and (3) are typical Chinese ergative alternations, (2b) and (3b) aretypical Chinese ergative constructions. While (4), (5) and (6) are not because subjectsof transitive verbs are parties and location nouns respectively, they are not the triggerof the action of the transitive verb.
............

Chapter Three Theoretical Framework....20
3.1 Feature Checking Theory.............20
3.1.1 Interpretable Features........20
3.1.2 Uninterpretable Features..............20
3.2 VP-shell.......21
3.2.1 Larson’s Design of VP-shell........21
3.2.2 Chomsky’s Design of VP-shell....23
Chapter Four The Syntactic Analysis of Chinese ErgativeConstruction.....26
4.1 Constrains on Chinese Ergative Construction....26
4.2 The Syntactic Properties of Chinese Ergative Construction....30
4.3 The Derivation of Chinese Ergative Construction........32
4.3.1 The Derivational Direction of Chinese Ergative Pairs.............33
4.3.2 The Derivation of Intransitive Chinese Ergative Construction...........36
Chapter Five The Semantic Properties of Chinese ErgativeConstruction.....39
5.1 The Semantic Properties of Chinese Ergative Construction....39
5.2 Causativity..............43

Chapter Six A Comparison of Ergative ConstructionBetween Chinese and English

(50a) is the subject-predicate construction, (50b) and (50c) are both acceptableEnglish ergative constructions. Just like Chinese ergative constructions, Englishergative constructions also take active form and express passive meaning.Syntactically, English ergative constructions also contain NP-movement and could beused in several kinds of tenses. The constraints on English ergative verbs are the sameas Chinese ergative verbs, i.e, only a part of unaccusative verbs could take part inEnglish ergative constructions. Semantically, English ergative 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。