英语论文网

Abstract: the theoretical circle in Sweden was recently have a perfect social security and puts forward Sweden is "really socialism" or "democratic socialism". I think, the Swedish social Democrats in creation of the welfare state and the practice of "promoting worker investment fund" trial, there are many experience and lesson is worth using for reference, but for the basic economic system, Sweden is still capitalism, rather than socialism.

Recently, someone to Sweden has the theoretical circle perfect social security and puts forward Sweden is "really socialism" or "democratic socialism". I think, comprehensive welfare state "of the famous Swedish economy and its social security system, and worth using for reference. However, just the basic economic system is concerned, it is still capitalism, rather than socialism.

A, the Swedish economy is the capitalist economy, is not socialism economy

In Sweden the "the general welfare" country, industry and agriculture, foreign trade and finance industry, basically master in the private enterprise in the hand, their production and circulation depends almost entirely on the capitalist market mechanism. As the British scholar Paterson and Thomas in the Western Europe the social Democrats, "a book said, all pushed by Swedish social Democratic Party of the characteristics of the policy is:" wait until income and private wealth created the redistribution of again after management ". "But these policy so far, no reform of the capitalist society general features: production material still to the private sector."
In the capitalist basic economic system, the capitalist class and the working class is this a welfare society two big basic class. The two great classes are highly organized, the national most were hired worker all took part in the federation of trade unions (LO), and most of the private business owners across the country were involved in the employer association (SAF). The two big national groups regularly negotiating and signing the wages and Labour protection agreement, the government is in the major controversy to step in.
I am putting the Swedish economy into capitalist economic category, because social economic form a distinction between the basic property, main shall be subject to the production material of the private ownership of the nature and decide. The capitalist economy is always in the production of material private ownership as the foundation, and socialism always associated with public ownership. Economic theory history tell us, not of marxist economics and western economics (modern economics), the past long-term of the capitalist and socialist know have error, namely all think that market economy can only be capitalist private ownership of the product and the inherent with no public ownership. Even so, they are to private ownership economy and the public sector of the economy as the difference of capitalist economy and the socialist economy of main basis. China's reform and opening in the early, deng xiaoping said, founding decades, what is socialism and not get, put forward the reform and opening up to "touch stone across the river". But the 1990 s, deng xiaoping summarized in both at home and abroad on the basis of economic development, put forward the idea of public ownershi本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。