英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

对比探讨英汉事件框架中的动词

论文作者:英语论文网论文属性:硕士毕业论文 dissertation登出时间:2012-08-21编辑:sally点击率:2652

论文字数:20000论文编号:org201208210945434553语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 44

关键词:对比探讨英汉事件框架动词

摘要:本论文的研究对目前仍在建设中的汉语框架网络有着一定的价值。本文以英语框架网络和汉语框架网络为基础,对事件框架中的动词做了对比分析。

对比探讨英汉事件框架中的动词  
通过分析,本文尝试着找出以下二个问题的答案:在英汉框架网络下,事件框架动词分别有哪些?英汉事件框架动词之间有哪些异同?英语框架网络对事件框架动词的分类是否适合汉语事件框架动词的分类? 如果不适合,汉语事件框架动词的分类应是怎样的?
Chapter One Introduction
    Verbs play a significant role in every aspect of a language. They are necessary in the sentences for they are considered as predicators of sentences. Due to their importance, verb studies have a rather long history of language both in English and in Chinese. An abundance of verb research has existed in the field of linguistics both practically and theoretically.
Linguists from different linguistic branches have devoted to and also made many attributions to the verb studies. Linguists interested in theoretical linguistics, such as semantics, grammar, syntax, etc. or cross-linguistics, such as psycholinguistics, or even other subjects, like computer all pay more attention to verbs studies, including definition of verbs, classification of verbs and so on and so forth.
    As to classification of verbs, linguists have tried many ways in order to achieve a relatively reasonable and comprehensive one. Each classification by using one approach has its own merits and dismerits. In 2000, the FrameNet project has been implemented in the University of California, Berkeley. In this project, words are classified and annotated both from semantic and syntactic perspectives. It can be regarded as a relatively comprehensive explanation, classification and annotation of words. (Pan Yanyan, 2003) After the successful construction of English FrameNet, Chinese FrameNet is under construction now. Some frames in Chinese have been completed, including event frame. This paper will observe the verbs within event frame of FrameNets in English and in Chinese by contrastive analysis to try to find some problems and then solve them.
1.1 Background of the Study
Semantics has experienced different stages through its theoretical development. In recent years, frame semantics as part of cognitive semantics has been popular and accepted by most of the linguists. It is helpful to understand the nature of language (Fillmore, 1986). Then, it is applied to the construction of the FrameNet with the help of computer science (Fillmore, 2001).Within the FrameNet, words can be classified into groups according to the semantic frame and then they are described by the semantic elements and the syntactic roles. Verbs are also in the same case.


References
[1]Carroll, Joyce A. Writing and Grammar:  Communication in Action [M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.
[2]Chapman R. Roget's International Thesaurus [M] (4th ed.). NewYork: Harper and Row, 1977.
[3]Fillmore, C. J. The Case for Case [C]. In: Bach Emmon, Harms Robert, eds. Universals in Linguistic Theory.  https://www.51lunwen.org/wordings/ New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968. 1一134.
[4]Fillmore, C. J. An Alternative to Checklist Theory of Meaning [C]. In: Cogen Cathy et al, eds. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1975. 123一131.
[5]Fillmore, C. J. Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language [C]. In: Harnad Stevan R, Steklis Horst D, Lancaster Jane, eds. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. New York: Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 1976. 20-32.
[6]Fillmore, C. J. Scenes-and frames Semantics [C]. Linguistic Structure Processing. (Fundamental Studies in Computer Science, 5), ed. Antonio Zam论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/2 页首页上一页12下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非