英语论文网

本文是一个disscusion prompt，是对An Alliance of Feminism and postmodern文章中一个对您感兴趣的一点进行分析。由留学论文代写之美国论文团队提供。
论文语种：英文
您的研究方向：哲学
是否有数据处理要求：否
您的国家：美国
您的学校背景：美国一流大学排名前30
要求字数：550
论文用途：本科课程论文 BA Assignment
是否需要盲审（博士或硕士生有这个需要）：否
补充要求和说明：是一个disscusion prompt.对一个文章进行中一个对你感兴趣的一点进行评论分析。附件有例文。

An Alliance of Feminism and postmodern

1.In “Feminism and Postmodernism: An Uneasy Alliance”, Seyla Benbabib discusses Both feminism and postmodernism are not merely descriptive categories: they are constitutive and evaluative terms, informing and helping define the very practices which they attempt to describe.

2. Seyla Benbabib explains that though feminism and postmodern have the tension and opposition, while they have many common similarities. Both are intentionally overthrow the existing tradition, both have tried to act in accordance with the ideal plan to change the realistic society, both express great concern on human dissimilation and materialization conditions due to modern society advocating science and technology, etc. These common similarities make feminism and postmodernism to present affinity and symphysic.

3. In this respect, feminism not only has affiliation and consistent with postmodernism’s positive constructive dimensions, fully absorbs and utilizes Foucault, Lyotard and Derrida’s advocating diversity, variety and difference among things, but denys their universality and homology (Humm, 50-51); But from postmodernism’s negative and destructive demensions we can find beneficial thought which is completely consistent with the dominant targets. That is to say the criticism of postmodernism to the traditional thoughts is actually destroying the existing “male centralism”way of thinking. Foucault shakes the rational position in the traditional thoughts, in addition to clearing up the rational subjectivity or subject idea, but also destroys the concept of “man” as a symbol of the male power, neither destroys the traditional metaphysics which is built based on the male and to exclude women; Lyotard attacks the traditional metaphysics system, leaving aside threating the "grand narrative" or the general theory, also criticizes the imprisonment in the way of thinking and the standard of the male, either the thought tradition of oppressing women. Their ideas although have great negative impacts on feminists to establish general theory to raise female subject consciousness, guiding women in social history to change their passive position, while these ideas can act as strong theoretical weapons for feminist to fight against male centralism and to eliminate the gender inequality. But Derrida critizes “logos centralism”, this eliminates the binary opposition between the essence and the presentation, the speech and the handwriting, the male and the female in the western tradition. The core of the traditional binary structure regards the former as the norm, the latter as the variation, the former rules the latter, and the latter obey the former. He overturns the traditional binary structure, he does not directly destroys the “genderneutral”, but destroys the “male centralism” tradition which is reflecting the male limited insights (Valerie, 263), so he breaks the traditional gender mode that the male domintes the women and the women obey the male, and proposes they have the equal status. This for feminist theory construction and political practice provid本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。