英语论文网

their citation rankings for the three stages, respectively. Since we picked the number of citations as a cutoff criteria, the number of articles in each stage varies from 52 in Stage 1 (cutting off at 2 citations), to 55 in Stage 2 (cutting off at 5 citations), to 57 in Stage 3 (cutting of at 15 citations). We listed these articles in Table 2. Third, for top journals, we used the same strategy to select top 50 journals that published papers on expatriate management. The cutting off points are 3, 7, and 29 for Stage 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Table 3 shows the top 50 journals.

Upon examination of Figure 1, it is obvious that the development of expatriate management field has enjoyed a long history and experienced an exponential development in the last decade or so. According to the results of Figure 1 and Table 1, the INK of expatriate management in a given time period emerges as clear as “twinkling stars in the cloudy sky of knowledge” that symbolizes the historical timeline. Influential authors appeared in each decade of the last 50 years. Between 1957 and 1966, Oberg (1960) and Gullahorn (1962) were the major scholars; between 1967 and 1976, Hays (1971), Baker (1971), and Miller (1973) were the major scholars; between 1977 and 1986, Tung (1984), Mendenhall & Oddou (1985), Hofstede (1980), Torbiorn (1982), Nicholson (1984), and Church (1982) emerged as the brightest stars; between 1987 and 1996, Black (1991), Adler and Bartholomew (1992), Selmer (1989), Feldman and Thomas (1992), Gregersen (1990), Naumann (1992), Brewster (1991), and Stroh (1994), Harzing (1995), Brett (1995), Harris (1995), Aryee (1996), Birdseye (1995), Guzzo (1994), McEvoy (1995), and Earley (1987) were the most significant contributors, and along the historical timeline, in 1997-2006, Caligiuri (1998), Shaffer (2001), Harvey (1997), Dowling (1999), Aycan (1997), Suutari (2002) and Ones (1999) were the most prominent researchers.

From Table 2, if we look at the authors of top 10 articles in each stage, it is very interesting to see that at Stage 1, there is no clear indication of the top 10 articles beyond the first two, 20 articles tied for the third place of 3 citations each. For the total of 22 articles, 18 of the most cited were by different authors. It is clear that the expatriate management research was sparse at this stage there was sparse and that there were no dominant authors or articles in this field. The cutting off point of the top 50 articles at this stage is 2 and the range of citation among these 50 articles is from 2 to 5. This confirms our stage hypothesis that expatriate studies at this stage is initializing. Journals at this stage (Table 3) are also from different disciplines.

At Stage 2, however, it is clear that the expatriate research field started to form rapidly. Among the top 10 most cited articles, two of them were written by Black (1988; 1990) and Tung (1981; 1982), respectively and the most cited one is Mendenhall and Oddou's (1985) article published in the Academy of Management Review. The range of citations of the top 50 articles is from 5 to 23, a significant increase from Stage 1. Studies in this field were clearly evident in highly respected journals in the disciplines of m本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。