英语论文网

the learner. Feedback is composed of two maindistinguishable parts: indication and correction. In indication, the learner is simply informedhow about his or her performance. In correction, the learner's performance will be given somespecific information: through explanation, provision of the correct target language form, ormetalinguistic information about the nature of the error，or any combination of these.Corrective feedback, as one of the many kinds of feedback, informs the learner that theirresponse is incorrect and with the knowledge of the correct or desired response provided.

Chapter Three Methodology........... 29-36
    3.1 The Aims and Research Questions.......... 29-30
    3.2 Participants.......... 30
    3.3 Treatment Materials and Procedures.......... 30-34
    3.4 Testing Instruments ..........34-35
        3.4.1 Oral imitation Test..........34
        3.4.2 Written Production Test..........34
        3.4.3 Exit Questionnaire.......... 34-35
    3.5 Data Analysis ..........35-36
Chapter Four Results and Discussion ..........36-44
    4.1 Comparisons of Oral Recasts, Written Direct.......... 36-38
    4.2 Comparisons Among Oral Metalinguistic..........38-41
    4.3 Exit Questionnaire ..........41
    4.4 Oral Recasts Versus Written Direct Correction..........41
    4.5 Oral Metalinguistic Versus ..........41-42
    4.6 Differential Effects of Oral..........42-44
Chapter Five Conclusion ..........44-47
    5.1 Major Findings of the Study.......... 44
    5.2 Pedagogical Implications.......... 44-45
5.3 Limitations and Recommendations.......... 45-47

Conclusion

The purpose of the current study is to examine whether the medium of correctivefeedback influences the effects of L2 acquisition. To answer this question, two comparisonswere carried out in the current study: (a) oral recasts versus written direct correction and (b)oral metalinguistic versus written metalinguistic CF. The comparisons are as follows:
1. Written direct correction is superior to oral recasts in the study. This may have beendue to either the implicit-explicit difference or to the medium provision difference.
2. The oral metalinguistic feedback is as effective as the written metalinguistic feedbackin promoting the acquisition of English past tense forms. These two types of correctivefeedback are both explicit, providing learners with both the correct form and metalinguisticexplanation.
The effectiveness of these two is due to their explicitness, which implies thatwhether the CF is provided in an oral or written way is not influential in promoting L2acquisition. Thus, the medium of the corrective feedback does not influence the effects of L2acquisition.The results of the exit questionnaire imply that metalinguistic CF performs better thanCF types without metalinguistic information in causing learners* error noticing.All these findings indicate that the degree of CF explicitness influences the effects of L2acquisition. The本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。