英语专业学生英语功能语类T的习得研究 [5]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2017-05-02编辑:lgg点击率:6550
论文字数:38547论文编号:org201704291541405070语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语毕业论文英语功能语类 T中介语语法最简方案
摘要:本文是英语毕业论文,本文考察动词屈折系统和中介语语法系统有助于讨论语言的词法和句法之间的关系是否是独立的或直接相关的另一个。此外,不同的意见之间受损,”“不,”还在于他们的关系。
cases respectively. With regard to confusion11, we calculate the clauses in which present-tense finite verbs with 3sg –s are used rather than inflected past-tense finite verbs and past-tense finite verbs are used rather than inflected present-tense finite verbs. Accordingly, in terms of omission, we eliminate the above-mentioned cases of confusion and only calculate those clauses in which uninflected verbal forms are used to alternate with inflected forms in obligatory contexts. Table 4.1 provides their respective proportions.
..........
CONCLUSION
The major findings of the present research are summarized as follows. First and foremost, in our empirical study, Chinese L2ers of English do omit and misuse the 3rd person singular present-tense and past-tense markings in their ILGs to a certain degree. As their English proficiency level improves, Chinese L2ers have better performance in using verbal inflectional morphology (3sg –s and –(e)d) on thematic verbs. English majors in basic group have acquired the past-tense morphology worse than the present-tense marking. However, for those in advanced group, their mastery of the present-tense morphology and that of past-tense morphology are more or less the same. L2ers, by and large, perform better in using present-tense verbal inflection –s than past-tense inflection –(e)d. In a word, Chinese L2ers of English have mastered the features [present] and [past] that Chinese does not involve. Secondly, as the subjects in both groups are fully aware of the discrepancies between finite and nonfinite verbal forms and can distinguish finite forms from nonfinite ones, functional category T is present in their ILGs. Furthermore, their distribution of finite and nonfinite verbal forms is not random. Only nonfinite forms are used where finite forms are expected, while no finite verbal forms occur where nonfinite ones are expected. Therefore, the feature [±finite] of English functional category T is fully specified in their ILGs. Last but not least, they all place the thematic verbs on the right of VP-adverbs and negator not (n’t). What’s more, though Chinese allows null subjects in finite clauses and does not have case feature, the finite clauses in our English majors’ written texts all have overt subjects. Meanwhile, the pronominal subjects are all a
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。