英语论文网

The Bretton Woods institutions in the decision-making mechanism , there are many unreasonable place , the urgent need for change . Outstanding performance for the three unreasonable : First, unreasonable distribution of voting rights . Bretton Woods institutions, the voting rights of its members exercise their rights to participate in international governance based on voting by the reflection of the fundamental principle of the sovereign equality of voting power and to reflect the contribution of the weighted voting formed. Fundamental right to vote is fixed for each Member State has a right to vote , and voting is weighted with the share of the increase , this arrangement has led to fundamental right to vote with a serious imbalance in the ratio weighted voting , with " one country, one vote ." based on the principle of sovereign equality eventually "dollar " Decision replaced by the principle of the voting rights . Currently, developing countries and developed countries in the IMF and the World Bank, the proportion of the voting rights of 44:56 and 43:57 respectively . The voting rights of a few developed countries is dominated by the United States is " a country dominant" owns IMF 16.77% of the voting rights , Japan, Germany, France and the UK the proportion of the voting rights were 6.02% , 5.88 % , 4.85% and 4.85% , the five countries control 38.37% of the voting rights . Judging from the World Bank , the United States was 16.36% of the voting rights , Japan, Germany, France and the UK the proportion of the voting rights were 7.85% , 4.48% , 4.30% and 4.30% , the five countries control 37.29% of the voting rights. Voting determines the decision-making power , voting overly concentrated on a few developed countries have led to its actual veto. According to International Monetary Fund and the World Bank charter, unless there are special provisions, the resolution made by the two institutions , more than half of the voting rights must be obtained to pass , major decisions will need to obtain 85% of the voting rights , which in fact gives the United States in these two institutions veto on major decisions .

二是份额分配不合理。布雷顿森林机构各成员国的份额是投票权分配制度的基础，而份额计算公式则又是关键所在。然而，份额计算公式的参数及权重的选择缺乏科学依据，尽管份额计算公式包括GDP、储备规模、经常项目收支、开放程度等变量，但从历次份额分配的情况来看，份额计算公式中有关参数和权重的调整不仅没有公开程序，而且具有较大的随意性，严重影响份额计算公式作为决定成员国份额客观依据的公平性与合理性。

Second, the share allocation is unreasonable. Bretton Woods institutions, the Member States the share of voting rights is the basis for the distribution system , while the share of the formula in turn is the key. However, the share of the calculated parameters and the choice of weights lack of scientific basis , despite the share is calculated including GDP, reserve size, current account balance , openness and other variables , but the previous share allocation of the situation, the formula for calculating the relevant share weight adjustment parameters and not only did not open procedures , but also has greater randomness , seriously affecting the share is calculated as an objective basis for decision member States share the fairness and reasonableness . The resulting voting exaggerated developed the weight in the international economy , and the economic strength of emerging market economies in the share of the growth has failed to ge