英语论文网

1.1 Overview
The study of modification is essential for appropriate understanding of nominalconstructions in a language. It is one of the prime means to extend sentence meaningand provide contextual coherence. However, it had been long being neglected to studymodifiers up to recent years as they were treated as additional elements of a language,only playing the role of elaborating sentence meaning and contextual binding. In fact,it is an irrefutable truth that sometimes without modification it is impossible toconvey the full meaning of a sentence and the role of modifiers weighs far more thanis expected. For example:(1) a. He is a man.b. *He is the man.Although example (1a) is grammatically correct, it does not give anyinformation about he as the pronoun he itself conveys the message a man. Therefore,it does not make sense to any readers unless a specific context is given or added somemodifying elements and they would keep questioning what kind of a man he is.Example (1b) is also confusing and unacceptable without modification or context asthe definite article restricts the word man to its particular context or modifier. Withoutproper modification, readers cannot catch who is indicated in the sentence, too. Fromthese examples it is obvious that modification is essential part for a language to offernecessary information to the reader and contribute its part largely to the understandingof a sentence meaning.As it is also the case in Uyghur language, the idea of making contrasts betweenthese two languages on their modification part attracted my interest. To the author sobservation, both languages have their modification system, sharing some structuralsimilarities and differences with their own distinctive features. Here similarities anddifferences are only applied to structures at the surface level which are observable tothe naked eye, especially to the position of modifiers at most times. The existence ofmodification system in both languages provides basis for holding contrastive studythough these two languages belong to different language families. As is known to all,English is a synthetic-analytic language with the basic word order SVO and has lessmorphological changes of words while Uyghur language is an agglutinative languagewith the basic word order SOV and with morphological abundance. Englishsometimes depends on morphological changes to express various grammaticalmeanings, but, at most times, still relies on constituent order while Uyghur language,on all occasions, resort to morphological changes of words to mark the mutualrelations between language elements. Therefore, the change of constituent order forthe languages like English which largely rely on the position of constituents in asentence means the change of grammatical and semantic relations between them. Forexample:(2) a. Mary saw John.b. John saw Mary.Examples (2a) and (2b), as it is clear from observation, consist of the samecomponents but express different semantic and grammatical relations. In example (2a),Mary is the agent of the sentence while John is the patient. On the contrary, inexample (2b), the reverse is true though the two sentences are sharing the samecomponents. So the position of elements in a specific sentence cannot be changed atwill as the change of position will result in different sentences in meaning. But, i本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。