英语论文网

作为四项基本语言技能之一，写作一直被认为是最困难的一年来实现的，在人类的思想和感情的表达，它一直发挥着重要作用。这就是为什么“写作一直是应用语言学的中心话题在超过半个世纪，但仍然是一个热闹的英特尔智识的研究和讨论”（海仑，2005：1）。CO相干性是一块良好的写作的一个重要标准。相干理论告诉我们，，话语标记可以使那些连贯关系内更明确的文字和恢复这样的连贯关系是至关重要的。因此，本文侧重于英语写作中的话语标记。在过去的二十年中，大量的话语标记研究已经开展。虽然一些研究者的首选其他如“话语颗粒”，“联结”，“务实的表情”，或“务实标记”的条款，术语“话语标记”（DMS）是比较常用的工作对英语语篇的研究人员采用，因此，笔者将使用术语“话语标记”在这个纸。As one of the four basic language skills, writing has always been considered as themost difficult one to achieve, and it has always played an important role in theexpression of human beings’ ideas and feelings. That is why “writing has been a centraltopic in applied linguistics for over half a century but remains an area of livelyintellectual research and debate” (Hyland, 2005: 1). Coherence is an important criterionof one piece of good writing. Coherence theory tells us that discourse markers can makethose coherence relations more explicit within a text and the recovery of such coherencerelations is essential. Thus, this thesis focuses on the discourse markers in the Englishwriting.A great deal of research on discourse markers has been carried out during the pasttwo decades. Although other terms such as “discourse particles”, “connectives”,“pragmatic expressions”, or “pragmatic markers” are preferred by some researchers, theterm “discourse markers” (DMs) is more commonly employed by researchers who workon English discourse, and the author will therefore use the term “discourse markers” inthis paper.

1.1 Background of the Research
常用话语标记在日常生活中，它提供了扬声器/作家各种各样的方式来实现自己的交际目的/写作目的和促进听众/读者了解隐含意义的对话/写片。温习过去的40年，利息在DMS与话语分析和语用学的发展增加了不少。过去研究显示DMS口头沟通话语的连贯性的重大作用，但不支付足够的注意力转向DMS书面话语的连贯使用DMS书面话语研究虽然没有形成系统，有些应用语言学家们学习写作，如Grabe先生和Kaplan（1996），Bublitz（1999）和Lorenz（1999）认为DMS方便以书面话语的连贯性。Discourse markers are commonly used in daily life, which offers speakers/writers avariety of ways to achieve their communicative goal/writing purposes and facilitatehearers/readers to understand the implicit meaning of conversation/writing pieces. Overthe past 40 years, interest in DMs has increased enormously with the development ofdiscourse analysis and pragmatics.Most of the past studies have shown the significant role of DMs in discoursecoherence of verbal communication, but do not pay enough attention toward thecoherent use of DMs in written discourse．Although studies on DMs in writtendiscourse do not form a system，some applied linguists who study writing, such asGrabe and Kaplan (1996), Bublitz (1999) and Lorenz (1999), hold that DMs facilitatecoherence in written discourse. To be more exact, DMs contribute to both local andglobal coherence of written discourse. Meanwhile, coherence is one of the basicrequirements of written discourse or writing. Incoherent writing or written discourse isonly a combination of isolate units or segments without enough or proper cohesivedevices, such as DMs. Since DMs facilitate coherence of writing, they may be adoptedin teaching writing.Some studies have been carried out on DMs in English writing at home, such asChen Xinren (2002), Luo Yi (2003), Mo Junhua (2005) and so on. For example, ChenXinren (2002) tries to find out how Chinese EFL learners made use of DMs in theirwriting, especially in the argumentative writing. Luo Yi (2003) studies adverbialconjunctions in English major postgraduates’ academic writing, and reports that overuseof adverbial conjunctions and deficient use of corroborative conjunctions were common.Mo Junh本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。