英语论文网

1.1 Background of the Study
除了比尔·洛，也有其他学者在这一领域做大量的工作。辛克莱（1996）定义语义韵律“的功能选择连接目的的意义。”据他介绍，语义韵的态度和务实的一面，语义，语用学的连续。其他著名学者，如拔（2001年），圣灵降临节SITT（2005）和（2007）Hunston亦发展这一概念。在过去的几十年里，语料库语言学，特别是计算机技术的快速发展，取得了很大的进步已经在研究语义韵律。例如，没有计算机和语料库，将英语学习者难以区分“完全”“彻底”，是因为传统的英语词典和英语课本只告诉他们这两个词的意思是“完全”。语料库的帮助下，只用两个词来区分。 “完美”是积极的，因为它往往并置与积极的话，如“完美容忍/可行的/接受/足够”等，而“完全”是负数，因为它并置与否定词，如“彻底摧毁/抹黑/邪恶/荒谬的“，在中国，语义韵律的概念首先引入中国，在2000年（吉武，2000）。伟（2002）首先介绍了语义韵律系统在他的作品中，包括概念，方法和最新的发展。然而，就整体而言，中国语义韵律研究才刚刚开始。Besides Bill Louw, there are other scholars doing significant jobs in this field. Sinclair(1996) defines semantic prosody as “the functional choice which links meaning to purpose”.According to him, semantic prosody is attitudinal and on the pragmatic side of thesemantics-pragmatics continuum. Other prominent scholars such as Stubbs (2001), Whitsitt(2005) and Hunston (2007) also develop this concept.In the past few decades, with the fast development of corpus linguistics and especiallycomputer technology, great progress has been made in the studies of semantic prosody. Forexample, without computer and corpus, it would be difficult for English language learners todistinguish “perfectly” from “utterly”, because traditional English dictionaries and Englishtextbooks only tell them both words mean “completely”. Only with the help of corpus, couldthe two words be distinguished. “Perfectly” is positive since it often collocates with positivewords such as “perfectly tolerable/feasible/acceptable/adequate”, etc., while “utterly” isnegative since it collocates with negative words such as “utterlydestroyed/discredited/evil/ridiculous”.In China, the concept of semantic prosody was firstly introduced into China in 2000 (Ji &Wu, 2000). Wei (2002) firstly introduced semantic prosody systematically in his works,including the concept, methodology, and the latest development. However, on the whole, thestudy concerning semantic prosody in China has just begun.

1.2 Significance of the Study
语义韵律的研究提供了英语教学在中国的一个新的视角。首先，语义韵律侧重于学习语言的搭配在一个句子中每个单词的相互影响。通过长时间使用自己的语言，以英语为母语的人也很难用言语错误的语义韵律。然而，这是不正确的，当它涉及到中国的英语学习者。由于他们缺乏语言环境，因为负迁移，中国英语学习者有时是不知道的英语单词的搭配，因此他们可能会误解或误用的语义韵律。The study on semantic prosody provides a new perspective on TEFL in China.Firstly, semantic prosody focuses on the mutual influence of each word in a sentence bystudying language collocation. Through the long time use of their language, native Englishspeakers can hardly use words with wrong semantic prosody. However, this is not true when itcomes to Chinese English learners. Since they lack language environment and because ofnegative transfer, Chinese English learners sometimes are not aware of the collocation ofEnglish words; therefore they may misunderstand or misuse the semantic prosody. So the studyon semantic prosody can play an instructive role in TEFL in China.Secondly, the study on semantic prosody helps Chinese English learners with thedistinction of synonyms. The traditional way of learning the synonyms relies on the students’intuitional experience and the definitions on the dictionary. The weakness here is that even if thestudents memorize what the dictionaries tell them, they may still use the wrong collocations. Onthe other hand, by introducing the concept of semantic prosody and corpus in TEFL, teacherscan demonstrate the vivid language patterns used by native English speakers, thus helping thestudents with their collocation weakne本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。