英语论文网

to understand but fail to be figured out because of lacking of relevantbackground knowledge. If the participants know little about the western culture, theywill feel quite difficult in understanding English humor because humor understandingcannot be independent from humor culture. Therefore, cultural difference does blockthe students’ understanding of those humor stories which require the participants’relevant common cultural background. They always make use of the cultural points in their native language simply, and fail to understand the targets properly due to theremarkable difference.Last but not least, conceptual blending theory is not enough to be used to analyzeand understand English humor stories, in that there are some other necessary toolswhich are also crucial to this issue except for the above elements cited. It is easy to beseen from the results of the two tests and the questionnaires that the participantscannot understand some of the humor stories even though there are introduced theconceptual blending theory and its detailed operating process. What’s more, theconceptual blending theory is not powerful enough to solve all the difficulties inunderstanding English humor, since it merely provides a theoretical basis for thestudents to understand and analyze English humor stories. Therefore, the conceptualblending theory will be of little use if the participants are unaware of the relevantbackground information or related cultural backgrounds.

Bibliography
[1] Aristotle, trans. Butcher, S.H.. “Poetics.” The www.51lunwen.org/languagethesis/ Internet Classics. Web Atomics. 2000. Web. 23April 2010. [2]. Part I.
[2] Attardo, Salvatore. The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor [J].Humor: International Journal of Humor Research. 10 (4), 1997: 395-420.
[3] Attardo, Salvatore & Raskin, Victor. Script theory: Joke similarity and jokerepresentational model [J]. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research. 4(3),1991.
[4] Attardo, S. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin and New York: Atherthon, 1994:196.
[5] Bergson, Henri. “Laughter” (1900). Comedy [C]. introd. Wylie Sypher. New York:Doubleday, 1956.
[6] Chiaro, Delia. The Language of Jokes: Analyzing Verbal Play [M]. London &New York: Routledge. 1992.
[7] Fauconnier, G. & Turner, Mark. “Principles of Conceptual Integration” [A]. Discourse andCognition [C]. ed. by Jean Pierre Koening. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 1998a.
[8] Fauconnier, G. & Turner, Mark. Conceptual Integration Networks [J]. CognitiveScience. 22(2) 1998b.
[9] Fauconnier, Gill. Mental Spaces. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. Rev. Ed. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1994.
[10] Fauconnier, Gill. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language.New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。