英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

汉语学龄期孤独症谱系障碍儿童的叙事衔接及连贯能力探讨 [2]

论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2024-02-09编辑:vicky点击率:464

论文字数:42522论文编号:org202402041019596179语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66

关键词:英语论文格式范文硕士论文范文

摘要:本文是一篇英语论文格式范文,本研究选取了来自杭州市的16名8到11岁的孤独症儿童作为被试,借助无字绘本《青蛙,你在哪里?》进行叙事语料诱发。衔接层面根据黄国文及Halliday和Hasan的衔接手段分类分别统计各项衔接手段的使用频率及准确率;连贯方面基于故事语法理论分析孤独症儿童在各项故事元素上的表现。

in cohesion and the scores in each coherence element are concluded as descriptive statistics to shed light on children’s narrative performance. Furthermore, a detailed analysis on narrative samples, which supplements the findings from descriptive statistics, is also conducted so as to provide a full picture of autistic children’s narrative ability in cohesion and coherence. 

Chapter Two  Literature Review

2.1 Definitions

2.1.1Definition of Narrative

From the perspective of etymology, the word ‘narrative’ is derived from a Latin word ‘narrativus’, which means “telling a story”; The word ‘narrate’, which means ‘relate’ or ‘tell’, originates from a Latin word ‘narrare’. Given these, the key implication of narrative is initially ‘narration’ or ‘story’. However, narrative incorporates different definitions in different research fields as the narrative study develops in depth. 

In the field of linguistics, Labov (1972) is the pioneer in narrative study. He defined narrative as a combination of two or more independent clauses to describe a real or virtual event in chronological order. In addition, narrative discourse connects different language components into a complete and logical story (Hao, et al., 2018), which requires narrators to possess overall knowledge about events and story elements, select proper words, sentences, verb tense and linguistic connectives, and memorize specific story episodes (Shapiro & Hudison, 1991). Narratology of Structuralism, focusing on the internal characteristics of narrative discourse, studies the genre of narrative text and expounds how these internal elements are effectively integrated into a cohesive and coherent whole (Sang & Zhang, 2014). 

2.2 Evaluative Criteria to Narrative

Every narrative, whether in oral or written form, is meaningful and informative. For a better understanding of the events, the narrative should be analyzed in detail (Karadeniz, 2017). Analyzing different narratives involves different theories and approaches accordingly (Kuzu, 2016). From the perspective of text linguistics, narrators are expected to meet two main challenges in producing a narrative: cohesion and coherence. 

2.2.1 Cohesion

In terms of cohesion, the taxonomy of the cohesion devices put forward by Halliday and Hasan (1976) in Cohesion in English is widely used in a large number of academic studies, both at home and abroad (e.g., Karadeniz, 2017; Çetin & Bayat, 2020; Cui, 1997; Xu, 2000;). According to Halliday and Hasan (1976), cohesive devices can be divided into five categories: reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion. Based on them, Shapiro and Hudison (1991) evaluated the cohesion of children’s oral narratives from the following two major levels: interclausal connectives (additive, continuative, adversative-causal and temporal connectives) and pronoun strategies (confused strategy, general strategy, nominal strategy, thematic-subject strategy, anaphoric strategy, indeterminable). In another study by Shapiro (1990), in addition to those two aspects, he added the intraclausal connectives (prepositional phrase and relational clause) into cohesion evaluation. Koutsoftas and Petersen (2017) assessed children’s written narrative from referential ties (personal, demonstrative and comparative) and conjunctive ties (additive, a论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非