英语论文网

Globalization of production allows companies to break down the manufacturing process into its separate stages, each in the most advantageous location. MNEs see developing countries as attractive locations for operations which depend on abundant low-cost labour.

1.4 Global transformations:

Globalization’s hallmarks are increasing and deepening among organizations and individuals across the world. However, there are differing views on the extent of the changes taking place. The hyper-globalization view of convergence toward a global system has been somewhat blunted by the evidence of fragmentation in markets and societies, as well as nation centric policies of governments. The less radical view sees global transformations taking place in businesses, governments and societies through increasing interactions and evolving changes.

At the beginning of the 90’s, there was an enormous support for globalization. They believe that everybody, both of the developed and the less developed countries will benefit. Since then, globalization has united the world but against it. In fact, one of the most important has been the global movement against globalization.

It’s a global movement involving hundreds of thousand people all around the world.

The problem with globalization is that it is asymmetrical. The rich are getting richer and the poor just stay poor. Even if the poor were to get a little richer it would not mean that the poor are getting a fair share or the benefits of economic interrelations.

2.1 Alter-globalization: “Another world is possible”.

is the name of a social movement that supports global cooperation and interaction, but which opposes the negative effects of economic globalization, feeling that it often works to the detriment of, or does not adequately promote, human values such as environmental and climate protection, economic justice, labor protection, protection of indigenous cultures and human rights. Many alter-globalists, unlike anti-globalists, seek to avoid the “disestablishment of local economies and disastrous humanitarian consequences” (Hinkelammert, Franz Josef; Ulrich Duchrow (2004). Property for People, Not for Profit: Alternatives to the Global Tyranny of Capital. Progressio. pp. vii).

they see their movement as an alternative to what they term neo-liberal globalization in which international institutions (WTO, World Bank, IMF etc.) and major corporations devote themselves to enriching the developed world while giving little or no attention to the detrimental effects of their actions on the people and environm本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。