英语论文网

美国国会在1931年的大萧条时期通过了Davis-Bacon法案。根据这一法案一项法律开始实施------要求政府承包商支付代表联邦政府利益的项目现行工资。这项立法的影响是超过40个州通过了“小Davis-Bacon法案”或“普遍工资”的法律。但后来，许多州又废除了这些律例。不过,在包括密歇根州在内的今天的许多州，仍然在继续施行这些似乎已经从萧条时期过时的法律 (韦德尔1997)。本文将试图认真研究实施这些法律的影响是什么，以及仔细审查密歇根州些法律的制定。应当对在一个州使用这些法律所突出的优点和缺点提供各种统计数据。本文将讨论密歇根州关于这些法律所面临的各种问题，并对密西根州是否应该继续实施或废除这些规则提出一些解决方案和建议。

包括联邦政府在内的许多辖区，设置的工资与那些劳动者根据union-scale所要求的完全或非常的接近。

Prevailing Wages And Michigan Economics Essay

The U.S. Congress passed the Davis-Bacon Act in 1931 during the Great Depression. According to this act, a law was implemented that required governmental contractors to pay ‘prevailing wages’ on projects that it took on behalf of the federal government. The effect of this legislation was that more than 40 states adopted the ‘little Davis-Bacon Acts’ or ‘prevailing wage’ laws. This was then, but later on, many states repealed these statutes. Still, many states today, including Michigan, carry on with such laws that seem to have become obsolete from those Depression-days (Vedder 1997). This paper shall attempt to take a closer look as to what the implications of implementing such laws are, with scrutiny of these laws as enacted in the state of Michigan. Various statistics shall be presented to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of using such laws in a state. The paper shall discuss the various issues that Michigan has faced in regards to these laws and will come up with some solutions and recommendations for the state of Michigan on whether it should continue to implement these rules or repeal from them.

Many jurisdictions, including that of the federal government, set the prevailing wages exactly at or very near to those that are demanded by the laborers according to the union-scale. “Prevailing wage laws, then, force contractors on government construction or other projects to pay their employees at the same rate as unionized members of the relevant occupation—whether it be bricklayers, carpenters, electricians, or other categories of workers—even if non-union contractors could perform the same work less expensively by paying their workers lower but mutually agreed-upon wages” (Vedder 1997). The governments usually use a very complex and intricate method to set these prevailing wages, “but because of the large number of distinct geographic labor markets and numerous occupational categories, the tendency is for wages to be set equal or approximate to those determined in local collective bargaining agreements between unions and contractors” (Vedder 1997). This is not true for all the states as in many of the states, these prevailing wages are not so obviously connected to the pay scales provided by the unions. Michigan, however, is considered to be a ‘strong’ prevailing wage state and本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。