Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÍø

ÁôѧÉú˶ʿÂÛÎÄ Ó¢¹úÂÛÎÄ ÈÕÓïÂÛÎÄ °ÄÖÞÂÛÎÄ TurnitinØâÇÔ¼ì²â Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄ·¢±í ÁôѧÖйú Å·ÃÀÎÄѧÌØÇø ÂÛÎļÄÊÛÖÐÐÄ ÂÛÎÄ·­ÒëÖÐÐÄ ÎÒÒª¶¨ÖÆ

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿Ó¢Óï½ÌѧӢÓïÂÛÎÄÉÌÎñÓ¢ÓïÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎĸñʽÉÌÎñÓ¢Óï·­Òë¹ã¸æÓ¢ÓïÉÌÎñÓ¢ÓïÉÌÎñÓ¢Óï½ÌѧӢÓï·­ÒëÂÛÎÄÓ¢ÃÀÎÄѧӢÓïÓïÑÔѧÎÄ»¯½»Á÷ÖÐÎ÷·½ÎÄ»¯²îÒìÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄ·¶ÎÄÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄ¿ªÌⱨ¸æ³õÖÐÓ¢Óï½ÌѧӢÓïÂÛÎÄÎÄÏ××ÛÊöÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎIJο¼ÎÄÏ×

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

°Ä´óÀûÑÇÂÛÎÄÓ¢¹úÂÛÎļÓÄôóÂÛÎÄ·ÒÀ¼ÂÛÎÄÈðµäÂÛÎÄ°ÄÖÞÂÛÎÄÐÂÎ÷À¼ÂÛÎÄ·¨¹úÂÛÎÄÏã¸ÛÂÛÎÄŲÍþÂÛÎÄÃÀ¹úÂÛÎÄÌ©¹úÂÛÎÄÂíÀ´Î÷ÑÇÂÛÎĄ̈ÍåÂÛÎÄмÓÆÂÂÛÎĺÉÀ¼ÂÛÎÄÄÏ·ÇÂÛÎÄÎ÷°àÑÀÂÛÎÄ°®¶ûÀ¼ÂÛÎÄ

СѧӢÓï½Ìѧ³õÖÐÓ¢Óï½ÌѧӢÓïÓï·¨¸ßÖÐÓ¢Óï½Ìѧ´óѧӢÓï½ÌѧÌýÁ¦¿ÚÓïÓ¢ÓïÔĶÁÓ¢Óï´Ê»ãѧӢÓïËØÖʽÌÓýÓ¢Óï½ÌÓý±ÏÒµÓ¢Óï½Ìѧ·¨

Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄ¿ªÌⱨ¸æÓ¢Óï±ÏÒµÂÛÎÄд×÷Ö¸µ¼Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄд×÷±Ê¼ÇhandbookÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÌá¸ÙÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎIJο¼ÎÄÏ×Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÎÄÏ××ÛÊöResearch Proposal´úдÁôѧÂÛÎÄ´úдÁôѧ×÷Òµ´úдEssayÂÛÎÄÓ¢ÓïÕªÒªÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÈÎÎñÊéÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎĸñʽרҵÃû´Êturnitin³­Ï®¼ì²é

temcetÌýÁ¦ÑÅ˼¿¼ÊÔÍи£¿¼ÊÔGMATGREÖ°³ÆÓ¢ÓïÀí¹¤ÎÀÉúÖ°³ÆÓ¢Óï×ÛºÏÖ°³ÆÓ¢ÓïÖ°³ÆÓ¢Óï

¾­Ã³Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿ÂÃÓÎÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿´óѧӢÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿ÖÐѧӢÓïÂÛÎÄÌâĿСѧӢÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿Ó¢ÓïÎÄѧÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿Ó¢Óï½ÌѧÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿Ó¢ÓïÓïÑÔѧÂÛÎÄÌâĿίÍñÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿ÉÌÎñÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿×îÐÂÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿Ó¢Óï·­ÒëÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿Ó¢Óï¿çÎÄ»¯ÂÛÎÄÌâÄ¿

ÈÕ±¾ÎÄѧÈÕ±¾ÓïÑÔѧÉÌÎñÈÕÓïÈÕ±¾ÀúÊ·ÈÕ±¾¾­¼ÃÔõÑùдÈÕÓïÂÛÎÄÈÕÓïÂÛÎÄд×÷¸ñʽÈÕÓï½ÌѧÈÕ±¾Éç»áÎÄ»¯ÈÕÓ↑Ìⱨ¸æÈÕÓïÂÛÎÄÑ¡Ìâ

Ö°³ÆÓ¢ÓïÀí¹¤ÍêÐÎÌî¿ÕÀúÄêÊÔÌâÄ£ÄâÊÔÌⲹȫ¶ÌÎĸÅÀ¨´óÒâ´Ê»ãÖ¸µ¼ÔĶÁÀí½âÀýÌâÏ°ÌâÎÀÉúÖ°³ÆÓ¢Óï´Ê»ãÖ¸µ¼ÍêÐÎÌî¿Õ¸ÅÀ¨´óÒâÀúÄêÊÔÌâÔĶÁÀí½â²¹È«¶ÌÎÄÄ£ÄâÊÔÌâÀýÌâÏ°Ìâ×ÛºÏÖ°³ÆÓ¢ÓïÍêÐÎÌî¿ÕÀúÄêÊÔÌâÄ£ÄâÊÔÌâÀýÌâÏ°Ìâ´Ê»ãÖ¸µ¼ÔĶÁÀí½â²¹È«¶ÌÎĸÅÀ¨´óÒâ

ÉÌÎñÓ¢Óï·­ÒëÂÛÎĹã¸æÓ¢ÓïÉÌÎñÓ¢ÓïÉÌÎñÓ¢Óï½Ìѧ

ÎÞÓÇÂÛÎÄÍø

ÁªÏµ·½Ê½

ÁôѧÉúºê¹Û¾­¼ÃÂÛÎÄ [5]

ÂÛÎÄ×÷ÕߣºÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÂÛÎÄÊôÐÔ£º°¸Àý·ÖÎö Case StudyµÇ³öʱ¼ä£º2014-12-18±à¼­£ºyangchengµã»÷ÂÊ£º13215

ÂÛÎÄ×ÖÊý£º5960ÂÛÎıàºÅ£ºorg201411122324439588ÓïÖÖ£ºÓ¢Óï EnglishµØÇø£ºÖйú¼Û¸ñ£ºÃâ·ÑÂÛÎÄ

¹Ø¼ü´Ê£º¾­¼ÃЧӦÁôѧÉúÂÛÎĺê¹Û¾­¼ÃHuman DevelopmentEcuadorRemittances

ÕªÒª£º±¾ÎÄÊÇһƪÁôѧÉúºê¹Û¾­¼ÃÂÛÎÄ£¬Ö÷Òª·ÖÎöÔÚ¶ò¹Ï¶à¶û»ã¿î¶ÔÈËÀà·¢Õ¹µÄÓ°Ï죬ÎÒÃÇÖصã·ÖÎö½ÌÓýºÍÎÀÉúÖ¸±ê£¬ÒÔ¼°Ò»Ð©ÆäËûµÄÏû·Ñ±äÁ¿¡£ËäÈ»ÎÒÃÇ·¢ÏÖ»ã¿îÔÚÏû·Ñ£¬½ÌÓýºÍÒ½ÁÆÖ§³ö¾ßÓлý¼«Ó°Ï죬µ«ÊǽÌÓýºÍ½¡¿µ½á¹û²¢Ã»ÓÐÏÔÖøµÄЧ¹û¡£

span>What is the exact volume of remittance inflows in Ecuador?

 

As shown in the previous section, the bulk of recent reports and updated data on remittances published by multilateral organizations like the World Bank or the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) underline the high volume of remittances relative to the size of recipient economies, particularly for Latin America. [12] According to the Multilateral Investment Fund, Latin America and the Caribbean received US$62,300 million in remittances in 2006; that is, 15% more than the previous year. This figure includes remittances to Ecuador: US$2,900 million in 2006. The World Bank records similar figures: US$2,922 million in 2006 and an expected increase to US$3,178 million in 2007. [13]

 

Other official sources at the national level indicate similar amounts. According to Banco de Espa?a (central bank of Spain), Spain¡¯s remittances to Ecuador amounted to US$1,453 million in 2006. [14] This figure is slightly higher that recorded by Banco Central de Ecuador (central bank of Ecuador): almost US$1,300 million coming from Spain; that is, 44.2% of total flows from all origins. [15] Data from Banco Central de Ecuador coincide with World Bank and IADB figures (See table 1).

 

There are well-known problems in dealing with remittance figures. Perhaps the most common is the inability of central banks to totally capture this flow, since a significant portion is transferred through informal financial channels. In this sense, some authors recommend household surveys in order to assess the effective volume of transfers (see, for instance, ¨¢lvarez et al. (2006) and Hern¨¢ndez-Coss (2005)). This is precisely what Instituto Nacional de Estad¨ªsticas y Censos (INEC, the national statistics office) did in Ecuador. However, the most recent national household survey (Encuesta de Condiciones de Vida) in 2006 revealed a significantly lower volume of transfers. According to this source, Ecuadorian households received US$732 million in 2006, of which US$322 million came from Spain [16] . A higher figure is published by Jim¨¦nez-Mart¨ªn et al. (2007), in a study that estimates the volume and destination of remittances both inside and outside the European Union. This research identifies Spain-Ecuador as one of the main remittances ¡°corridors¡±. In 2004, the estimated flow through this corridor was €571.4 million, or approximately US$711 million.

 

The considerable differences between various sources of data might be attributed to an overvaluation of remittances by central banks reporting to multilateral organizations; to an undervaluation by INEC and Jim¨¦nez-Mart¨ªn et al. (2007); or to both. Actually, data published by Banco de Espa?a is also just an estimation of this flow; it is not entirely based on reporting by the financial system. As explained by ¨¢lvarez et al. (2006), this came as a response to the low volume of remittances being recorded by the reporting system. Inflows from Spanish migrants to Northern Europe in the 1960s and 1970s were still exceeding outflows to developing countries, despite ±¾ÂÛÎÄÓÉÓ¢ÓïÂÛÎÄÍøÌṩÕûÀí£¬ÌṩÂÛÎÄ´úд£¬Ó¢ÓïÂÛÎÄ´úд£¬´úдÂÛÎÄ£¬´úдӢÓïÂÛÎÄ£¬´úдÁôѧÉúÂÛÎÄ£¬´úдӢÎÄÂÛÎÄ£¬ÁôѧÉúÂÛÎÄ´úдÏà¹ØºËÐĹؼü´ÊËÑË÷¡£

Ó¢¹úÓ¢¹ú °Ä´óÀûÑÇ°Ä´óÀûÑÇ ÃÀ¹úÃÀ¹ú ¼ÓÄôó¼ÓÄôó ÐÂÎ÷À¼ÐÂÎ÷À¼ мÓÆÂмÓÆ Ïã¸ÛÏã¸Û ÈÕ±¾ÈÕ±¾ º«¹úº«¹ú ·¨¹ú·¨¹ú µÂ¹úµÂ¹ú °®¶ûÀ¼°®¶ûÀ¼ ÈðÊ¿ÈðÊ¿ ºÉÀ¼ºÉÀ¼ ¶íÂÞ˹¶íÂÞ˹ Î÷°àÑÀÎ÷°àÑÀ ÂíÀ´Î÷ÑÇÂíÀ´Î÷ÑÇ ÄÏ·ÇÄÏ·Ç