英语论文网

act of:

Direct involvement in projects

Activities of contractors

Uses of products & services

1

Procedures in place fro stakeholder engagement & feedback

2

Procedures in place to achieve resolution of disciplinary or grievance issues evidencing a clear ability to deal with dishonesty, corruption or unethical behaviour by employees or people with whom the company does business

2

Achievement of targets relating to BEE, employment equity, procurement & skills development

2

Active community relations

2

REPORTING & CONSULTATION CRITERIA

RATING

Public disclosure of quantitative, comparable data on major social sustainability relevant to the company

2

Stakeholder engagement

2

Performance against targets reported on

1

ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT

The assessment of the three pillars of the “triple bottom line” has shown the following:

Environmental assessment: the Eastern Cape Parks Board has as its mandate biodiversity management, yet the environmental assessment shows that the rating as used has produced a total of 18 out of a possible 54 giving the organisation a rating of 33,33%. For an organisation that has the environment as its core business, this score is poor and would indicate that the organisation needs to look at the areas where the rating was zero or one and improve its monitoring and achievement of targets.

Economic assessment: the Eastern Cape Parks Board has a need to realise income from its activities, its grant from the Provincial Government is inadequate to meet its operational needs and it therefore needs to generate additional income from activities in order to meet its needs. The assessment of the economic bottom line has realised a score of 20 out of a possible 45 giving the organisation a rating of 44, 44 %.

Social assessment: the Eastern Cape Parks Board has a demonstrated policy and procedure in place to address the social issues through its People and Parks Programme. This programme is aimed at involving local communities in the operations of the protected areas and for communities to derive an economic benefit from the protected areas. On this assessment, the organisation has scored 31 out of a possible 54 giving it a 57, 4% rating which is the best rating of the three pillars.

The overall rating for the Eastern Cape Parks Board is therefore 45% which indicated that there is still work to be done in achieving the principals and mandate that the organisation has to report on.

CONCLUSIONS

The Agency has a number of challenges to overcome in order to meet the requirements of a sustainable organisation. The Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency is reliant on a grant that is provided by the Provincial Government through the Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs and is based on a five year strategic plan and operational plan. The funding that is received has proven to be inadequate for the Agency to meet its stated objectives and mandate. The protected areas are underfunded and a legacy of poor infrastructure has been inherited from the previous departments. This has placed major 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。