摘要:合供给方式不排斥政府提供,也不排斥市场化,并且有效整合了第三部门、社区、个人等多种方式。根据政府结构、需求现状、地理、文化特质来选择供给方式,这样的选择过程是一个 “逐级过滤”的过程,即各种提供机制和方式组成的集合,经逐级过滤,最终选出最合适的供给方式。具体而言,在提供公共物品时,可以有效运用多样化、混合式和局部安排等方式。
c good , if not appropriate to expand the sector to increase its staff to improve the salaries and office expenses , resulting in a lot of waste. And in a democracy , civil servants subject to lifetime employment protection legislation ( even without the civil service, government staff in fact is lifetime employment ) , there is no competitive pressure to strive to improve the work efficiency. ( 2 ) government officials lack the profit motive . As government officials can not put profits for himself , plus the costs and benefits of public goods is difficult to measure , so and corporate directors and managers of different government officials not to pursue the goal of profit maximization , but rather to maximize the scale , in order to increase their opportunities for advancement and expand its sphere of influence , which will inevitably lead to bloated, overstaffed and inefficient. ( 3 ) lack of effective supervision of government officials . Because of its government -run business has a natural monopoly, monopoly blockade can be used as part of public goods resources and costs involved in the information , and supervisors rely on the information provided by supervisors supervise , is likely to be blinded by supervisor and manipulation.
Government provision of public goods , the economic functions of the play, the effectiveness of intervention in regulating economic activity , is built on the basis of such a basic assumption , that the Government, as the representative of the public interest , goals and their behavior is consistent with the public interest , Since the existence of market failures , through the role of government can better achieve optimal allocation of resources and social welfare maximization. However, the reality is not so simple , the Government is not detached from the reality of a relationship between socio-economic interests of the hands of Almighty God , it is by various institutions , organizations layers is again composed of officials . Whether government officials or government agencies have their own behavioral goals , and these behavioral objectives and public interests are not naturally aligned between , in other words , the government 's behavioral targeting and social differences between the public interest , and its mainly due to : ( 1 ) government officials but also economic ones, but pursue their own interests . In a market economy , the behavior of government officials with the goal of economic agents in the market, there are some similar behavioral targeting side, where possible , they should seek to maximize their own interests , government officials and even private organizations are more than conditions to pursue their own interests. Therefore , government officials are more likely , but conditionally cynical pursuit of self-interest , regardless of whether the result is in the public interest . ( 2 ) itself is not a government agency without its own interests over the interests of organization, but the inherent benefits of government officials into the government 's interests. The effectiveness of government economic functions play an implicit premise is that the government is an impartial organization on behalf of the public interest , it is not. Government agencies have their own interests, this interest is the government agency staff , mainly government officials internalize their personal interests , or that the collection , the government in the social and economic life of th
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。