澳大利亚法律学论文范文 [2]
论文作者:英语论文论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-10-13编辑:zcm84984点击率:13487
论文字数:6602论文编号:org201409271711524180语种:英语 English地区:澳大利亚价格:免费论文
关键词:环境法律人权的概念Human RightsLaw Essa概念分析y
摘要:本文是旨在分析印度的环境法律和人权的概念的一篇留学生论文,随着环境破坏的发生,这已经成为了人类生存和发展的一个主要威胁,环境法律已成为推动发展的同时不受环境破坏的最重要的工具。
protection that would help ensure the well-being of future generations as well as the survival of those who depend immediately upon natural resources for their livelihood.’ Here, the end is fulfilling human rights, and the route is through environmental law.
The second approach places the two spheres in inverted positions – it states that ‘the legal protection of human rights is an effective means to achieving the ends of conservation and environmental protection.’ The second approach therefore highlights the presently existing human rights as a route to environmental protection. The focus is on the existing human right. In this context, there exists a raging debate on whether one should recognize an actual and independent right to a satisfactory environment as a legally enforceable right. This would obviously shift the emphasis onto the environment and away from the human rights. These are the subtle distinctions between the two ways in which this approach can be taken.
A third approach to the question of ‘human rights and the environment’ is to deny the existence of any formal connection between the two at all. According to this approach, there is no requirement for an ‘environmental human right.’ The argument goes that, since the Stockholm Conference in 1972, international environmental law has developed to such extents that even the domestic environments of states has been internationalized. In light of the breadth of environmental law and policy, and the manner in which it intrudes into every aspect of environmental protection in an international sense and notwithstanding the concept of state sovereignty, it is argued that it is unnecessary to have a separate human right to a decent environment. This view militates against the confusion of the two distinct spheres of human rights law and environmental law.
There has been a great deal of debate on the theoretical soundness of the idea of a human right or rights to a satisfactory environment. For one thing, there can occasionally be a conflict, or tension, between the established human rights and the protection of the environment per se. There are circumstances where the full enjoyment of the rights to life, to healthy living and to ones culture can lead to the depletion of natural resources and environmental degradation. Nevertheless, clearly there is a prima facie rhetorical and moral advantage in making the environment a human rights issue. There has been a simultaneous increase in ‘legal claims for both human rights and environmental goods,’ which is a clear reflection of the link between ‘human’ and the ‘environment’ and the dependence of human life on the environment.
LEGISLATIVE INITIATION
It is possible to suggest with conviction that the beginnings of Indian environmental law were sown at the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held at Stockholm in 1972, where India was a participant, leading to some sort of realization that a framework of laws was necessary to deal with environmental hazards that would result from the stage of development that India was entering in the 1970s. Prior to this phase, Indian environmental law mainly consisted of claims made against tortuous actions such as nuisance or negligence. Some of the major acts that have came about after this are mentioned hereunder:
1974 - The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act establish
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。