英语论文网

the full bench of FWA made an order to end the industrial action two days after the Qantas grounding. In the order, all industrial actions needed to be terminated, while Qantas can no longer lock out its workers, and unions have been restricted in what they can do. Also, the temporary suspension sought by the three unions had been rejected as it bringing uncertainty for the industry. Justice Giudice, The inaugural President indicated continuing actions would bring significant damage to the tourism industry (Lauder 2011; The Sydney Morning Herald 2011 & Dziedzic 2011). It is crystal clear that neither government nor statutory tribunal do not want to disturb the relations between firms and Unions by giving mandatory order until the action seriously impact the national economy and citizens' normal lives. In Qantas dispute, the impact is not only nationwide, but also worldwide. That offered sufficient reasons to focus executive to end up dispute by using political power.

Secondly legislature is pointed out, 'Legislature is a law-making boding comprising representatives elected by the people at periodic election' (Bray et al. 2011, p. 128). Generally, the parliament makes laws and rules to ensure rights of employees and employers in industrial relations. Employees consisted into a large percentage in population, and majority of employees being members of unions, which has a deep effect on industrial relation law in Australia. As Labour coming to power in recent years, more protective labour laws are made which endows large right to employees and unions in industrial relation.

Thirdly, judiciary will be considered by this report. Since 2009, the judicial function of court about industrial relation exercised under Fair Work Australia (FWA). Precisely speaking, power of adjust industrial relation dispute is no longer belonging to judiciary system and it becomes parts of the executive. But courts still play its role in dispute between union and federal government. In Qantas dispute, even though Qantas represents Australia in internationally, it is still a private company. As a result, court could not get involved into it.

建议动作——Suggested action

5.1 政府——5.1 Government

Government promises workers more profit in order to win in election lead to injustice in government policy, endowing unions' prerogative. From customers' perception, it is never agreed the union can do strike whenever they wanted, which unions abused their power to harm Qantas in some way (Reith 2011). This is one of the reasons that forced Alan Joyce announced grounding entire flights. Therefore it is vital for government to establish unjust law to make more equity relationship between employees and employers. Secondly, government should intervene in this dispute early, when affecting economy and disturbing social livelihood are predicted. Government should consider more about state instead of their political positions. If using an unused act can prevent those inconveniences to country and people, government should have been the first one performing right.

5.2澳航——5.2 Qantas

As is known to all, Qantas lost profit in recent year. To survive the company, CEO Alan Joyce made a restructure of company and is supported by Chairman Leigh Cliffo本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。