英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

Teachers’ Questioning Strategies in EFL Classroom [2]

论文作者:英语论文论文属性:职称论文 Scholarship Papers登出时间:2010-03-12编辑:lisa点击率:20077

论文字数:20995论文编号:org201003121316136397语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:免费论文

关键词:

on whose answer the teacher generally does not know. For instance, in this text “What is your understanding of the sentence ‘This was the last straw.’?” As for this, the answer is not that unique. Thus, the responder has enough space to show his reflection, imagination, creative ability, and the like.
2.3 Question Directing
Question directing refers to which student the teacher ought to ask. Some questions are better to be replied by the whole class; some by the superior ones; some by the inferior, etc. Different situations have different strategies which depend on teachers. It is general believed that questions should be answered by those qualified students. This is not equal to the way of only asking those so-called good students whose performances always among the first one third of the whole class. As for some simple referential questions, inferior students also can qualify and teachers should encourage them 本英语毕业论文英语论文网www.51lunwen.org整理提供to answer. If they just be called to answer “Yes”, or “No”, their passion of participation would be fading gradually. Thus, in order to provide each student opportunity to learn English well, teachers ought to design question directing according to questions as well as students’ characteristics.
2.4 Wait-time
Wait-time is the length the teacher waits after the question is given and before a student is called to answer. In other words, it is the length of the pause before which a student is called upon to answer question, i.e. the period of time between a question is given out and it is required to answer. This length plays an important role in the process of obtaining knowledge for students. Every teacher has his/her own teaching habit. It is generally said that a teacher with a fast tempo tends to give a too short wait-time and one with the habit of giving lessons at a slow pace often leaves a too long wait-time. And neither of them is accepted. The former makes students have the feeling of the anxiety and pressure; on the contrary, the latter is time-and-energy-consuming. Wait-time should vary due to different cases. The study of Linguistics professor Rowe(1996) shows that the wait-time given by teachers is always not more than 1s. This too-short-reflection-time results in the simple or no answers from students whose confidence will fade gradually in this ask-answer process. And he discovers that if the teacher lasts it to 3s to 5s, students will offer more correct information after carefully reflecting, discussing and the like.④ While, from the research of Freiberg in 900 tapes of teachers’ wait-time, he concludes that there are 10 positive effects of teachers’ wait-time of 5 to 8 seconds for students to respond during questioning:
1. The length of student response increased.
2. Student-initiated and appropriate responses increased.
3. Students’ failure to respond to questions reduced.
4. Students’ confidence in responding increased.
5. Students’ speculative responses increased.
6. Student-student interaction increased and teacher-focused increased.
7. Students’ evidence to support statements increased.
8. The number of students’ questions increased.
9. Participation of students who were identified as slower by the teacher increased.
10. The variety of students’ responses to teacher questions increased.
                 &nbs论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。
英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非