英语论文网

t is to say the focused directive WCFadopted in this study has a slightly effective on high-level students.

........

Conclusion

This part first synthesizes major findings of four research questions. Then it demonstratesthe theoretical and pedagogical implications for L2 writing teaching. At last, it discusses somelimitations which exist in the present study and provides some suggestions for further research.In this paper, 80 freshmen of non - English majors in a university of Taiyuan are tested tocompare the different forms of written corrective feedback in improving the grammaticalcompetence of the students writing. Furthermore, it investigates students’ attitude towards theteacher’s feedback. The major findings of the study can be presented as follows:By conducting focused direct WCF, the author finds that there is not significant differencebetween high-level and low-level students in their writing competence. In other words, thisfeedback method can help all the students in Class A in improving their grammatical competence.Also, it is noticed that the improvement of grammatical competence among students at the highlevel is not as significant as that among students at the low-level in English writing, which mayindicates that direct feedback is more effective in low-level students writing grammaticalcompetence than in high-level students.By conducting focused indirect WCF, the author finds that focused indirect WCF is effectivefor both high and low level students in their grammatical competence, but indirect feedback islittle more effective in improving the grammatical competence at low-level students. Combinedwith results from questionnaire, although such feedback can saves teachers time obviously, theauthor noticed that the students who received indirect focused corrective feedback are willing toreceive a more comprehensive feedback, that is direct feedback.
.........
Reference documents (omitted) 
本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。