Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2023-11-30编辑:vicky点击率:314
论文字数:52585论文编号:org202311211145123679语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
摘要:本文是一篇英语语法论文,本研究以句法-语篇界面视角下英语句法学习理论框架为基础,采用量化与质化相结合的研究方法探究中国英语学习者左偏置结构的习得发展情况。
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings
Based on the interface hypothesis and the theoretical framework for the acquisition of English LD, this study explored whether the acquisition of LD’s syntactic features and syntax-discourse interface features by Chinese learners could reach the native-like level and what developmental features were presented among different groups through three tasks. In addition, three main factors affecting the acquisition of English LD were found. The major findings are summarized below.
(1) The major findings on the acquisition of syntactic features of LD can be summarized in two points. Firstly, the collective data reveal that all three groups reach the native-like level in their acquisition of LD’s basic syntactic form, but they fail to reach the native-like level in the judgment of the other two incorrect types of LD. This suggests that some of the deeper syntactic rules are still challenging for them. Secondly, by identifying what native-like and non-native-like features each individual exhibits, this study found that the proportions of individuals in each group showing native-like features for the acquisition of these three syntactic features do not show an obvious increasing trend. Neither are there any significant differences in the proportions of non-native-like language features. The non-native-like language features of all groups are mainly divergence and optionality. The individual data demonstrate that the three groups do not show obvious differences in the acquisition of LD’s syntactic features.
(2) In terms of the comprehension of LD’s syntax-discourse interface features, for LD with discourse-new information (LD1), the collective data show that only the advanced group reaches the native-like level, for LD with inferable information (LD2), all three groups fail to reach the native-like level. Secondly, the individual data indicate that more individuals in the advanced group show native-like features, and the proportion between groups is significantly different under the two contexts. There are also patterns in the proportion of non-native-like language features between groups. For LD1, the proportion of divergence in the total frequency of each group significantly decreases as English proficiency improves, while the proportion of optionality tends to increase meaningly. For LD2, the proportion of optionality is significantly lower in the low-intermediate group than in the advanced group, and the frequency of divergence in the advanced group is much less. The optionality phenomenon is regarded as one non-obvious difference that characterizes near-native grammar (Sorace 2003). Therefore, the developmental trends of both could be summarized as the advanced learners showing the best comprehension, followed by the other two groups of learners. In general, the comprehension of LD’s syntax-discourse interface features is challenging for Chinese learners except for advanced learners’ comprehension of LD1.
reference(omitted)
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。