英语论文网

gation into the general tendencies and development ofLLS use involves only the sample of the freshmen and sophomores, so the results may notbe very predicative of the developing trend of Chinese university students. Thus it wouldbe necessary for the fixture research to expand the samples to all four-year students or toexpand the time span of the study to a four-year longitudinal study to replicate in order towork out a more complete route of LLS use and its association with English proficiency.Moreover, the study was conducted with participants from one university in China, sodefinitely the findings can not be popularized without any limitation and the futureresearch should involve more universities, more samples in the other areas to include avariety of educational contexts.
Thirdly, the current measurement of proficiency (for instance, final examinationscores) may not be very predicative of students' English level since it includes part ofteachers' somewhat subjective measures of grading and contains no direct measures ofspeaking, thus a more precise and objective measure of English proficiency may need to bediscovered to provide a base for LLS assessment (for instance, TOEFL or IELTS).
To conclude, as a newly-developed topic of interest in the field of Second LanguageAcquisition, for both researchers and language learners, language learning strategyresearch deserves the special attention and language learning strategy should be exploredfrom multiple perspectives and dimensions with varied subjects by different methods sothat convincing result can be achieved to contribute to the successful learning acrossChina.

Bibliography
1 Cohen, A.D. (1987b).Studying learner www.51lunwen.org/gzyylw/ strategies: How we get the information. InA.Wenden &J. Rubin (Eds), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.31-40).Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2Allwright, R. (1983). 'Classroom-centered research on language teaching and learning: abrief historical overview'. TESOL Quarterly 17:191-204
3Anderson, J. (1976). Language, Memory, and Thought. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
4Bialystok，E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. LanguageZearwmg,28(I),69-83.
5Bialystok E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency.Modern Language Journal, 65，24-35
6Brown，H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching (2nd). Englewood Cliffs，NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7Brown，H. D. (1994).Teaching by Principles: Interactive Language Teaching Methodology.New York: Prentice Hall Regents.
8Chamot，A.U. (1987). The power of learning strategies. Ohio Bilingual-MulticulturalUpdate，March, 4, 6-11.
9Chamot, A.U.，&0,Malley，J.M. (1987). The Cognitive Academic Language LearningApproach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2)，227-249.
10Chamot，A.U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In Wenden and Rubin.(1987). Learning Strategies for Second Language Acquisition .Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall.

本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。