构式语法视角下的商业广告语篇互文性研究 [3]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2016-11-01编辑:lgg点击率:5980
论文字数:38972论文编号:org201610311825326868语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语语言学论文构式语法互文性语篇构式压制
摘要:本文是英语语言学论文,通过对语篇构式压制框架下互文广告中互文性现象的分析和讨论,探讨了广告中互文现象存在的理据性,并为互文性表意机制进行了较为系统和形式化的阐释。研究发现,互文作为商业广告的一种创作手段,有利于实现广告的劝说功能。
uld be treated equally.
.........
2.2 Discourse Construction Grammar
Discourse Construction Grammar (DCG) is developed to cover the shortage of Construction Grammar’s only focus on sentence level of language phenomena. And its development should mainly contribute to the two leading figures’ hard-work in this researching filed, that is, Ostman and Yuan Ye. In the following section, the author will focus on their viewpoints.Ostman is the first linguist who proposes the notion of ‘construction discourse’. In the prolegomenon of Construction Discourse, he mainly argues that “certain ‘discourse pattern’ represent conventionalization of specific linguistic properties, which places them on an equal footing with the conventionalized pattern known as ‘grammar’, at least with respect to capturing speakers’ knowledge of a language as a symbolic system” (2005). The extension to research at the discourse level is essential to the development of Construction Grammar so that it can be a theory of language instead of being only a theory of grammar. Competing with other full-scale theory of language, like the systemic-functional approach of Halliday, it has the limitation for the reason that other approaches have taken the discourse into consideration at the very beginning and believed it plays an important role in deciding the meaning at sentence level and below. Thus, it is necessary for Construction Grammar to take a move beyond the sentence. To further explain this necessity, Ostman provides the supports from four aspects. Firstly, much of discourse is conventionalized, and this is accord with the basic notion of constructions which are seen as conventional associations of form and meaning. Since the units below the sentence like morphemes and words are acceptable as constructions, there is no reason to not consider discourses, which are longer stretches of language, as acceptable. Secondly, discourse is not in opposition but complementary to syntax.
...........
Chapter Three Analysis On Intertextuality in Commercial Advertisements ........ 36
3.1 Discourse Construction Coercion: An Interpretation to Specific Intertextuality ......... 36
3.1.1 Citation of Idioms ........ 36
3.1.2 Citation of Famous Speeches .... 41
3.1.3 Citation of Literary Masterpieces ..... 43
3.2 Discourse Construction Coercion: An Interpretation to Generic Intertextuality .....
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。