摘要:一般来说,色情,而更图形话或故事化,其表现形式还有戏剧和艺术作品。 另一方面,它是一个伟大的和可怕的社会罪恶,贬低和减少我们的人性,同时也迫使我们面对社会禁忌。
ly expressly that which 'eroticizes domination, degradation or violence' according to Senate File 2861. When the Olmsted County Commissioners were asked last summer to approve a similar prohibition, but never returned a vote.
妇女的权利:反对-Women's rights: Against
In her 1979 book Pornography: Men Possessing Women, Andrea Dworkin interprets pornography as 'training guides for committing sexual violence.' While this causal link rests on anecdotal evidence, Dworkin further contends that women reporting an experience of being sexually assaulted are not believed by men who view pornography. With the help of law professor Catharine MacKinnon and others, Dworkin began to form a framework for viewing pornography as a form of active discrimination and violence against women. They began by attempting to bring a lawsuit in for Linda Lovelace to stop showings of Deep Throat, who contended that she was raped throughout the making of the film. The suit failed due to the Statute of Limitations. They next attempted to draft a zoning law to keep adult bookstores out of residential neighborhoods, and again failed, this time due to free speech protection in the Supreme Court.
妇女的权利:支持-Women's rights: For
One of the groups challenging Dworkin and MacKinnon's work was a group calling itself the Feminist Anti-Censorship Task Force (FACT), which included authors Betty Friedan, Kate Millett and Adrienne Rich. They attacked Dworkin and MacKinnon's work as 'reinforcing sexist stereotypes'. Later, when Dworkin and MacKinnon proposed 'An Act to Protect the Civil Rights of Women and Children' (H. 5194) with Representative Barbara Hildt, the National Organization of Women (NOW) attacked the bill for taking the blame away from the criminals who committed the act, and placing it on the publishers, instead. In her book Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights (1995), law professor and former ACLU president Nadine Strossen points to Censorship as the true enemy of women's rights, not pornography. She argues that censorship is used to repress information relevant to women, and, by arguing for 'pro-censorship,' people like Dworkin and MacKinnon are actually doing more harm than good.
孩子的性-剥削Sexual Exploitation of Children
The laws which govern Child-porn and the 'Sexual Exploitation of Children', unlike those regarding pornography and obscenity, are not only rigidly defined, but also include descriptions of the potential effects on the victim.
Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 110, Section 2251 of the U.S. Code defines 'The Sexual Exploitation Of Children' as 'Any person who employs, uses, [. . . , etc.] any minor to engage in [. . .] any sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing [. . .] or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct' or 'Any parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor who knowingly permits such minor to engage in [. . .] any sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing [. . .] or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct'. This same section also provides provisions with regard to the transportation, distribution, and reproduction of these same images, including by computer.
对孩子的影响-Effects on the child:
According to the National C
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。