Organisation Global Governance [13]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2014-06-02编辑:lzm点击率:13316
论文字数:6451论文编号:org201406022027367647语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:免费论文
关键词:Organisation Global Governance全球治理全球化的复杂关系capitalist ideologyWallerstein’s world system
摘要:Global governance is emerging to manage the new wars and regulate the complex relations emanating from globalisation. States are gradually losing their competence while non state actors are assuming greater roles in the affairs of the world.
global liberal governance is more discerning and selective. Southern governments, project partners and populations now have to show themselves fit for consideration’’. (Duffield ; 2001, 7)
Contrary to the claims echoed by the European Commission Humanitarian Aid Department (ECHO) that approach will bring about efforts made to eliminate dependency on aid by humanitarian receipts. It would make more sense to look at the new wars as relationships emanating from the changes in the society as rightly captured by Duffield and base on such understanding view and treat the conflicts like organism and not machine (Duffield ;2002.99)
Treating conflicts like organism means solutions to the problem is simply removing the conditions that supports it survival. The supporting conditions are all crises of underdevelopment and issues supporting the creed greed and grievance causes of war. It is only by so doing that the world will be marching towards sustainable security and development.
Conclusion
Duffield’s argument that a system of global governance is emerging is valid base on the confirmatory global development. The present wars are fought within countries as against the usual interstate wars of the pre cold war era. Most of the new wars are reflections of long suppressed grievances caused by the uneven development within and between states. Presently, there is a ‘North and South’ in every country albeit different levels of development and underdevelopment.
The end of the cold war was complimented by the enthronement of the capitalist ideology. The solution proffered by the capitalism to address the underdevelopment crises was for states to subscribe to the model of development designed by the Bretton Woods institutions. Beside opening state economy to stiff trade competition, the loans failed to induce development but rather accelerated the wheels of globalisation.
Global governance is emerging to manage the new wars and regulate the complex relations emanating from globalisation. States are gradually losing their competence while non state actors are assuming greater roles in the affairs of the world.
Bearing in mind the Wallerstein’s world system analysis the question begging for answer is in whose favour is the global governance? Are there ways the system will address the uneven development in the world. The radicalisation of development demands that the crises in the South be taken more seriously.
New humanitarianism has turned further politicised aid intervention. It is against this background that globalisation the emerging system global governance is viewed as imperialism. After all, the process of capitalism set the wheel rolling. V.I. Lenin postulated that imperialism is the last stage of capitalism, is global governance another name for imperialism? When the chips are turn, US remain the hegemonic power and alleged to control the UN, World Bank and other key actors of global governance.
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。