英语论文网

6. Assignment
Questions
You are required to answer two questions in 4000 words (aim towards roughly equal size for both), using essay style, with full references (excluded from word count).
6 作业

问题

你必须用4000个词回答两个问题（目标大致相等的大小为），用散文风格，全参考（排除字计数）。

Question I
Consider the main themes that you were introduced to in sessions 1-8. Using specific examples drawn from the case study critically discuss different styles of leadership and potential behavioural responses.
. Ensure that you consider how both the formal and informal aspects to organizations (and people) might influence leadership  styles and potential behaviou ra I responses.
. Support your ideas with the use of relevant examples, credible argument and clear reference to the theory.
问题1

考虑的主要主题，介绍了在会话1-8。使用具体的例子来自案例研究的批判性讨论不同的领导风格和潜在的行为反应。

. 确保你考虑的正式和非正式的方面来组织（和人）可能会影响领导风格和潜在的行为反应的RA我。

. 支持你的想法和相关的使用例子，可信的论证和明确的理论参考。

Question 2
Consider the main themes that you were taught in sessions 9-16. "The problems facing FridgeCom are purely technical; wasting time on 'people issues' just complicates our job as .IS developers." Terry Cole

问题2

考虑的主要主题，你在会话9-16教。”面对fridgecom问题是纯粹的技术；浪费时间在“个人问题”只会让我们的工作。是开发商。”特里科尔

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
. Make clear whether and why you think that both technical and social issues should be considered in the design and use of the HRIS.
. Support your ideas with the use of relevant examples, credible argument and clear reference to the theory. Hints
. High scoring submissions will contain additional material which meaningfully integrates material from across the two parts of module o You must develop all your arguments using evidence from your reading, and with direct application to the case study

.Describing the theories is not what is expected. A critical consideration of theory as applied to the case study is required. Ensure that evidence is used to support all the arguments that are advanced.  The taught sessions can only serve as an introduction to the themes and the material available

. The best submissions will use this material as a starting point, not as a boundary to their knowledge acquisition
. Excellent work will not only present a critical approach to the material but will use relevant up-to-date peer reviewed journal articles