对企业社会责任的批判 [11]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2016-06-12编辑:cinq点击率:20243
论文字数:4000论文编号:org201606110926376169语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:免费论文
关键词:企业社会责任Corporate Social Responsibility留学生作业
摘要:本文是留学生企业社会责任作业范文,主要内容是通过一系列的方法和调查,对企业社会责任进行批判。
as 'Social Betterment'. He also stated that stakeholders expect from the company that it will satisfy them and show them their responsibility in the form of a document called CSR report.
The second is (CSR 2) which means companies are pressurized to issue the CSR report to show that what they have contributed for the welfare of the society. Companies are aware of the NGO's and different pressure groups which compelled these companies to maintain the standard and fulfil their social responsibility and this motivates the companies to get involved in CSR.
In last, (CSR 3) deals with this concept that there is an ethical factor for the companies to issue CSR report. Companies motivates by seeing their selves in a round picture that what they are doing for the society, what is their contribution for the environment and what they have contributed for economic benefits of the country.
The relation of Harrison's three level impacts with our findings:
Harrison (1997) presents three levels of company's responsibilities. The first two levels are done by almost every responsible company and the third is done by very rare companies which main motive is to develop healthy society. The three levels of Harrison are:
(Harrison 1997)
Harrison's three level impacts gave us the understanding of the companies getting involved in the process of CSR. The Level 1 is seem to be irrelevant to the CSR because doing legal obligation is must for every company and every company has to pay taxes and they also have to deal fairly with every other company. The Level 2 is same as Level 1 but the factor 'minimising negative effect' relates with CSR because every company is not thinking like this. Level 3 has the factors which meets the requirement of CSR. Employees are one of the main stakeholders of the company which influence company through its workforce. Employees think that employers should give them safe and healthy environment to work in. If any company became unable to provide that type of environment then it is not fulfilling its social responsibility towards the society and not removing social evils from the society. If any company in UK or from any part of the company paying its full attention towards CSR then it is called (CSR 3).
GOOD OR FALSE INTENTIONS??
CSR doesn't mean to be responsible in respect of society and environment, and it doesn't mean self sacrifice and managers don't do much than the requirement of the law. But they think more than this because they see their long term benefit which they can get in the future. They have realised now that by mixing together the impacts of economics, society and environment and by making a suitable corporate policy they will not just get benefits for themselves but also for all stakeholders.
They have also realised that CSR is 'good for business'. CSR not only give them the spot benefit but also for long term. If company spend its resources and money on CSR they believe that they will not only get economic benefit but also positive reputation and recognition from the society, Government and also from other stakeholders. It is compulsory for the company to be socially responsible if they want to remain competitive. It must also issue its CSR report and publicise it through electronically or on paper. One company gave the reason about the issuance of CSR report is that in 2001 UK G
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。