Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:案例分析 Case Study登出时间:2010-12-10编辑:anterran点击率:19428
论文字数:6841论文编号:org201012101327456505语种:英语 English地区:法国价格:免费论文
关键词:Free movement of goodsQuantitative restrictionsMeasuresequivalent effectConceptCases
Criminal proceedings against Bernard Keck and Daniel Mithouard
写留学论文(References for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance, Strasbourg)
(Free movement
of goods — Prohibition of resale at a loss)
Summary of the Judgment
Free movement of goods — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect — Concept — Obstacles to trade resulting from disparities between national legislation laying down requirements to be met by goods — Included — Obstacles resulting from national provisions regulating selling arrangements in a non-discriminatory way — Inapplicability of Article 30 of the Treaty — Legislation prohibiting resale at a loss
(EEC Treaty, Art. 30)
Any measure which is capable of directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, hindering intra-Community trade constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction, prohibited between Member States by Article 30 of the Treaty.
That definition covers obstacles to the free movement of goods which, in the absence of harmonization of legislation, are the consequence of applying to goods coming from other Member States where they are lawfully manufactured and marketed, rules that lay down requirements to be met by such goods (such as those relating to designation, form, size, weight, composition, presentation, labelling, packaging). This is so even if those rules apply without distinction to all products unless their application can be justified by a public-interest objective taking precedence over the free movement of goods.
By contrast, the application to products from other Member States of national provisions restricting or prohibiting certain selling arrangements is not such as to hinder trade between Member States, within the meaning of that definition, so long as those provisions apply to all relevant traders operating within the national territory and so long as they affect in the same manner, in law and in fact, the marketing of domestic products and of those from other Member States. Provided that those conditions are fulfilled, the application of such rules to the sale of products from another Member State meeting the requirements laid down by that State is not by nature such as to prevent their access to the market or to impede access any more than it impedes the access of domestic products. Such rules therefore fall outside of Article 30 of the Treaty.
It follows that Article 30 of the Treaty is to be interpreted as not applying to legislation of a Member State imposing a general prohibition on resale at a loss.
REPORT FOR THE HEARING
in Joined Cases C-267/91 and C-268/91 *
I — Facts
A — Legislative background
1.Resale at a loss is prohibited under paragraphs I and II of Article 1 of Finance Law No 63-628 of 2 July 1963, as amended by Article 32 of Order No 86-1243 of 1 December 1986. The text of that provision is as follows:
‘Article One
I — Any trader reselling a product in an unaltered state at a price lower than its actual purchase price shall be liable to a fine of FF 5 000 to 100 000. The actual purchase price shall be presumed to be the price on the invoice, plus turnover tax, specific charges relating to the resale and, where appropriate, the cost of transport.
II — The above provisions shall not apply:
to perishable goods from the time when their condition may deteriorate;
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。