英语论文网

美国是一个具有不均衡文化混合体的国家，缺少独特的文化背景。它是许多不同种族的人们的家园，持续不断的全球化移民浪潮也加剧了这种不均衡性。在过去，移民、少数民族、不同经济背景的人们被美国社会的主流人口分割开来，因此爆发了平权运动，要求克服社会内部的歧视问题。平权运动阐明，运动者们一定要积极主动、态度坚决的移除一切障碍，保障女性和少数民族有同等权利进入教育产业和政府组织。它坚持创造这样一种环境，如果个人有胜任这份工作的能力与证书，那么性别和种族就不应当阻碍他向上一阶级自由流动。它坚决与针对特定性别、种族或者宗教的制度歧视作斗争。尽管意图是单纯的，但时间长了发现这种平权运动导致了反向歧视，社会主流人群的权利陷入了危机。基于平权政策，人们开始偏好那些几乎没有优点的目标群体，少数民族的配额不经意中就被填满了。这使得许多白种男性的基本权利受到侵犯。因此，尽管平权运动起初是试图为所有社会成员提供平等的机会，最终却导致了对白人男性的歧视，所以这个运动是不道德的。

关于这对白人是否公平的问题始终存在着争论双方。有的时候，社会优势群体做出一点小小的牺牲比没有行动更好。

The United States of America is a nation with a non-homogeneous cultural mix and lacks a unique cultural background. It is home to people of different ethnicities and continuous global migration adds to the heterogeneity. In the past and the immigrants, minorities, and the economic sub-class of the people were seen as different from the mainstream population and hence Affirmative Action (AA) was formulated to overcome the discrimination within the society and the workforce. AA implied that employers must act positively, aggressively and affirmatively to remove all barriers that prevent women and minorities from having equal access to all levels of Educational industrial and governmental institutions (Soni, 1999). It seeks to create an environment where race and gender will not stand against someone's ability to move up the hierarchy if one has the necessary skills and credentials for the job (Libertella, Sora & Natale, 2007). It is meant to defend against institutional discrimination of people of a specific gender, race, or religion. While the intentions were pure, over time the imposition of AA started showing signs of reverse discrimination where the rights of the majority were at stake. Based on the policies of AA, people started giving pReference to members of the target group without merit and the quotas for minorities were filled up carelessly. This resulted in many white males being deprived of their basic rights. Thus Affirmative Action, while trying to provide equal opportunities to all, ends up discriminating against the white male, and hence is unethical.

There will always be two sides to an argument and whether it is fair to whites or not, remains debatable. At times, some sacrifices for the greater good of the society are better than no action. If this be true, AA is justified because the intention is to provide more opportunities to the minorities and women. Nevertheless, this amounts to social segregation. Arguments again abound that social segmentation exists in every society based on religion, race and economic differences. However, as long as individuals maintain personal prejudices, a perfect non-discriminatory system is impossible. It is continually debated whether the discrimination brought on by AA is indeed tolerable as the lesser of two evils. People have tried to justify that AA helped to make up for past injustices. However, instead of doing justice it violates the rights of the whites for equal consideration (Stanford, 2005). Besides, discrimination on the basis of a belief that one race or sex is inferior is wrong because it violates the moral right to equal respect (Himma, 2001). Decisions nee本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。