英语论文网

ent years also span increased at an average annual growth of 23%. From the inputs and outputs of government departments , China's government in 1978 to $ 1 administrative cost to produce 74 yuan GDP in 1996 to 68 yuan , by 2006 had fallen to $ 37. Moreover, serious waste of public spending . Of the public sector in the production or provision of public goods , the lack of awareness and cost savings constraint mechanism . Some local governments blindly pursuit of performance , leading to social resources and a serious waste of public expenditure . Internal waste of public institutions is also very serious . Beijing had the city's 48 government agencies in 2007 conducted a survey of energy consumption , the results show that 48 per capita energy consumption of government agencies , the per capita annual water consumption and per capita consumption are Beijing residents four times, 3 and 7 times .

Government intervention in economic activities or the provision of public goods is one of the necessary conditions for the effectiveness of government agencies themselves must be efficient , its inputs and outputs are economical, gainful . However , in reality, are manifested not satisfactory , government agencies tend to be costly ( input ) low efficiency ( output ) . Inefficient government agencies for many reasons , can be attributed to the following aspects : ( 1 ) lack of competition leads to low efficiency. Because government agencies monopoly supply of public goods , the lack of competitors , so that government agencies have neither the pressure nor incentive to reduce costs and improve efficiency , which may lead to excessive government investment , output more than social needs of the public good , if not appropriate to expand the sector to increase its staff to improve the salaries and office expenses , resulting in a lot of waste. And in a democracy , civil servants subject to lifetime employment protection legislation ( even without the civil service, government staff in fact is lifetime employment ) , there is no competitive pressure to strive to improve the work efficiency. ( 2 ) government officials lack the profit motive . As government officials can not put profits for himself , plus the costs and benefits of public goods is difficult to measure , so and corporate directors and managers of different government officials not to pursue the goal of profit maximization , but rather to maximize the scale , in order to increase their opportunities for advancement and expand its sphere of influence , which will inevitably lead to bloated, overstaffed and inefficient. ( 3 ) lack of effective supervision of government officials . Because of its government -run business has a natural monopoly, monopoly blockade can be used as part of public goods resources and costs involved in the information , and supervisors rely on the information provided by supervisors supervise , is likely to be blinded by supervisor and manipulation.

Government provision of public goods , the economic functions of the play, the effectiveness of intervention in regulating economic activity , is built on the basis of such a basic assumption , that the Government, as the representative of the public interest , goals and their behavior is consistent with the public interest , Since the existence of market failures , through the role of government can better achieve optimal allocation of resources and social welfare maximization. However, t本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。