Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2016-05-22编辑:lgg点击率:6764
论文字数:37283论文编号:org201605111755527120语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语教学法论文英语听力教学教师反思听力成绩大学艺术生
摘要:本文是英语教学法论文,本文依据英语教师每周的反思日志,可以看到教师在不断反思与学习中不断变化和成长,说明教师通过应用听力策略教学可以获得自身的进步与发展,能够提高英语教师的反思意识和促进英语教师专业的发展。
This section tried to examine the effects of the listening cognitive strategies instruction on the students’ listening proficiency in the experimental group and the results of the overall listening comprehension tests were to respond to the first research question. Although the subjects in two groups were randomly selected from the art majors with the nearly similar English listening proficiency before the study in Northwest Normal University, the t test can test and reveal the difference between the two groups as the t test is one of the most common statistical tests used to compare two means. Here in Table 5.1, mean of experimental group pre-test was 6.0 while the mean of control group was 7.1, and meanwhile SD of experimental group was 2.67 while control group was 2.44, which apparently shows that there is a slight difference in English listening proficiency in two groups. But is it significant and does it influence the results of the research? Then the t test can work much better. According to the Table 5.2, the mean difference was 1.1 of 35 and the Sig.=.380 was much bigger than .05. Hence the difference of mean scores in two groups was not significant. More importantly, the t test in Pre-tests of experimental group and control group was 1.334 > .05 and Sig.(2-tailed)=.191>.05, which convincingly indicates that there is no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in English listening proficiency before they were involved in the study. That is to say that the participants enjoy the same English listening proficiency at the beginning of the research, which better ensures the sound results of the following research.
...........