英语论文网

, and theoutcomes of phonological experiments can be either shift or convergence. Current research inthis field indicates that human perceptual system remains somewhat flexible throughout theentire life span and carries out modifications in order to respond to the changes in sensoryinput.

Chapter Three Theoretical Framework............ 21-24
    3.1 An Overview of Vivian Cook's Multicompetence........... 21
    3.2 Vivian Cook's Four Propositions ...........21-22
    3.3 Vivian Cook's Integration Continuum........... 22-23
    3.4 Summary ...........23-24
Chapter Four Methodology ...........24-34
    4.1 Research Question........... 24
    4.2 Participants ...........24-27
    4.3 Materials ...........27-30
    4.4 Experiment Design........... 30-32
    4.5 Procedure........... 32-34
Chapter Five Results and Discussion........... 34-48
    5.1 Results ...........34-41
        5.1.1 Results from the Response Time Test........... 34-36
        5.1.2 Results from the Judging Test........... 36-41
5.2 Discussion ...........41-48

Conclusion

Language transfer has always been one of the top research fields in Second LanguageAcquisition. Forward transfer and backward transfer are opposite-directional languagetransfers at the same level. Forward transfer has captured great attention from the researchersand scholars both at home and abroad. However, much less importance has been attached tothe studies on backward transfer compared to those on forward transfer. Very few papers andtheses concerning English influence on L2 learners' Chinese can be found in the domesticworld, let alone the studies encompassing empirical experiment and analysis from thecognitive perspective. In this study, two groups of participants took part in the Chinese syntaxjudging experiment in which their response time and judging selections for each set of thetesting sentences were recorded. The experimental group 1 was made up of advanced Englishlearners who might have more or less developed the integrated language system in theirindividual mind; the experimental group 2 consisted of close Chinese monolingual studentswho only had good foundation in Chinese so that there might be only one single languagesystem in each of their brains. Five distracter sentences were designed to mingle with tentesting sentences in the experiment, and the participants made judgments based on theirpresent language knowledge at their first reaction. The main findings of the experimentconcerning response time and judging selection are listed as follows:Findings in response time recording,
a) The average response time of the experimental group 2 was generally longer than thatof the experimental group 1 with two exceptions in sentence eight (pronoun with a clause asattributive ahead) and sentence thirteen (free subordinate clause sequence in complexsentence).
b) The maximum time gap 5165.1 ms appeared when two groups were reading andmaking judgments of the fifth sentence (transferred English “more+ prepositional phrase+than" structure) while the minimum gap 572 ms took up at t本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。