英语论文网

摘要：This study has enriched the previous studies on high school students’ learning strategies,more importantly; it provides valuable data and materials into the field of comparative studyof strategy use between high school common students and art students.

nbsp; 4.4 Instruments.......... 31-33
    4.5 Data collection and analysis.......... 33-34
Chapter Five Data Analysis and Discussions.......... 34-54
    5.1 Learning strategies used by common.......... 34-40
        5.1.1 Analysis of memory strategy..........35
        5.1.2 Analysis of cognitive strategy ..........35-36
        5.1.3 Analysis of compensation strategy.......... 36-37
        5.1.4 Analysis of metacognitive strategy ..........37-38
        5.1.5 Analysis of affective strategy.......... 38-39
        5.1.6 Analysis of social strategy.......... 39-40
    5.2 Learning strategies used by high school art students.......... 40-45
    5.3 Data comparison of strategies used by common..........45-48
5.4 Discussion of differences.......... 48-50

Conclusion

Though data in this study has been analyzed and discussed in a comparatively detailedway, some limitations do exist and have been listed as following:Firstly, the instrument applied in this study is quite limited. The questionnaire of SILL isthe only channel that data comes from. It is strongly recommended that beside questionnaire,Data should also be collected from other channels, such as interviews.Secondly, the sample size is limited. The number of tested student is 200, with 100common students and 100 art students. This limited size makes it difficult for findings in thisstudy to represent all high school students.
In conclusion, this study offers the author a clear insight into the difference in learningstrategy use between common high school students and high school art students. And thisstudy could be the basis for the author to make further research in language learning strategy.

References
1Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Lebiere, C. & Matessa www.51lunwen.org/gzyylw/, M. (1998). An integrated theory of listmemory. Journal of Memory and Language
2Chamot, A. & O’Malley，M.1984. Using Learning Strategies to Develop Skills in English asA Second language. FOCUS，September 1984，National Clearinghouse For BilingualEducation, P.1
3.Chamot, A.U.1987. The learning strategies of ESL students. In Wenden and Rubin(1987:71-84)
4.Chamot, A. & O’Malley，M.1994. The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the cognitiveAcademic Language Approach. Reading，MA:Addison Wesley.
5Cohen. A.1990. Language Learning: Insight for Teachers and Researches. NewYork: Newbury HouseCohen.A.1998. Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
6Cohen. A.2000. Strategies in Leaning and Using a Second Language. Shanghai:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
7Dansereau, D. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J.W. Segal, S.F.Chipman, & R. Glaser(Eds.). Thinking and Learning Skills. (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8Ellis,R.1985. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10Ellis, R. 1999. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai ForeignLan本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。