英语论文网

Traditionally it is said that every individual is a unique personality that cannot have its double but in the same time it an undeniable fact that some features of character are common for many people as well as their interests may also coincide and it is due to this human race is so solid and really unified.

传统上说，每一个人是一个独特的个性，在同一时间不能有双重性，有一个不争的事实是很多人以及他们的利益不一致，这是由于人很实在和真正的统一。

In fact it is hardly possible to deny tat the greatest people in history are to a certain extent alike. Naturally they had some difference, even very significant once but still they had a lot of in common what made them really great. To support this viewpoint it would be enough to have a look at the personality of two outstanding people: Constantine I and Tony La Russa. On the one hand they are not simply people from different epochs and continents but they worked in different fields but still they are to a certain extent similar in their methods of work despite all the differences that exist between them.
其实，这是几乎不可否认，最大的人在历史上都在一定程度上的一致好评。当然他们有一些差异，甚至是非常显著一次，但他们仍然有很多的共同点使他们很优秀。为了支持这个观点，去看看在两个优秀的人的个性：君士坦丁一世和托尼·拉鲁萨。一方面，他们不是简单的不同的时代和大陆人，但他们曾在不同的领域，但他们仍然是，尽管所有的人之间存在的差异，其工作方法在一定程度上类似。

Constantine I and his impact on Europe 康斯坦丁一世和他对欧洲的影响

Before starting to speak about the emperor Constantine I it is necessary to dwell upon the sources where the information about this person may be taken from.
At this respect, primary sources are of a paramount importance, particularly those which are written by his contemporaries or were created by himself. It seems to be obvious that they are very significant for any serious analysis because they convey the entity of the epoch Constantine I lived in and it naturally helps understand to what extent he influenced the future development of Europe and in the same time the life and work of Tony La Russa is described by his contemporaries only since he still leads an active life.
Moreover, basically primary sources permit to realize how innovative was the policy of the emperor and what effect his innovations had at those time. Consequently, it will contribute to the understanding of the effect of his life and work for the future history of the whole continent.
Actually, primary sources add that objectiveness for a researcher’s perception that may be lost while studying some secondary sources where the opinions of other authors and the degree of retrospection is much higher. What is meant here is the fact that in secondary sources authors extrapolate the deeds and events of the Constantine’s epoch to the future events and history. And vice versa they take into considerations the future events that took place after the death of Constantine I and the end of his epoch and transmit them to the period of life and work of the emperor. In such a way, a researcher deals with a bit changed information and cannot fully make his or her own judgment about the personality of Constantine I and his contribution to the history of Medieval Europe.
Speaking about primary sources that refer to Constantine I his life and work as well as to his epoch than it may be said that they are not very numerous but relatively sufficient compared本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。