英语论文网

t; collective responsibility " , the actual who does not assume the responsibility of persons responsible for the implementation of administrative accountability system generalization become a major obstacle .

将问责制度看成是上级对下级某个已知的具体过失的惩罚或仅仅等同引咎辞职。目前的政府问责还只是政府自身和内部的行政责任追究制度，追责只会是上级政府对下级政府垂直方向的问责或是行政干预。
The accountability system as superior to subordinate a known specific penalties for negligence or just equivalent to resign. The current government is only the government's own accountability and internal administrative accountability system , is accountable only for the higher levels of government accountability to lower levels of government or vertical administrative intervention . In addition , the direct and indirect responsibility responsibility , lack of executive responsibility and leadership responsibilities defined operability standards, flexible space on the division of responsibilities is too large , resulting in a lack of accountability stiffness , loss of impartiality .

Appease functions on the premise that officials responsible be held accountable when their punishment, if only to appease the victims , this non- institutionalized , non- standardized human injustice to accountability , but also for non- accountable officials would not achieve effective warning and deterrent role , it is difficult to remind them of the right to administrative positions with caution , but also may lead to selective accountability of principal officials , has reached the exclusion of dissidents and pro- development forces political purposes. On the other hand , too much emphasis on comfort features , in fact, will be placed in the so-called career official evaluation among public opinion , increasing the accountability of uncertainty. On the other hand , may allow the executive management and non- management officials believe that a kind, whether accountability lies not in their own management , resulting in indiscriminate policy .

Too much emphasis on the accountability of party committees and other cadres , ignoring other subjects accountability . On the one hand , the administrative accountability system often reflects superior to subordinate level, but did not solve the superiors who have accountability . The higher and lower levels have joint and several liability , it is often very difficult to ensure accountability, fairness . On the other hand , our start is with the body of accountability , according to the party by the party or government agency documents and administrative regulations to implement accountability , but they ignore the accountability of cadres outside the system .

Administrative accountability system showing the development stages , over uneven development . Pushed the country administrative accountability system is still in the pilot stage , showing a characteristic stage of institutional change . Some places, such as Hainan , Shanxi , etc., not only the provincial government to develop the relevant rules and regulations, the provincial cities have developed in conjunction with local circumstances corresponding measures ; while in some places , administrative accountability legislation and enforcement are still relatively weak . Generally speaking, China has not yet formed a good administrative accountability practices and traditions.

It is the existence of the problem , so that our lack of administrative accountability is s