英语论文网

The legal system is a complete implementation of administrative accountability system prerequisites. Although China comes to administrative accountability laws, rules, regulations and normative documents a lot, but there is no a unified , comprehensive administrative accountability law , in practice , in many cases requires accountability , and so there is no corresponding program the clearly defined , and thus there is a " can not ask " phenomenon. As Professor Ma Huaide said: " a sound institutional system , not a ' headache medicine head , feet hurt the disease ' , nor is it the old movement and the ' storm ' ; but once faced with the problem , the law can be automatically run to deal with, calm and orderly . " " Building ' responsible government ' , the need to develop a more standardized, more stable , more predictable legal system, and strictly implement . " administrative accountability system applicable provisions scattered in various policy documents , both the party's regulations , there are government regulations ; existing central government introduced , but also local governments to develop this: there is no unified national laws around the different standards. In this regard , we must improve the administrative accountability of the legal basis for the administrative accountability and administration according to law together. Not only to timely start "Chief Accountability Law" work to the law applicable to the form of administrative accountability objectives, scope , criteria, procedures, etc. to make specific and clearly defined, and to promptly modify some of the existing laws , regulations and policies regulations.

理论上讲行政问责的对象是各级行政机关及其公务员，但主要是负有直接或间接领导责任的领导者，即各级政府机关和各职能部门的领导。在我国各级各类有关行政责任追究的法规制度中，在追究的责任人前面，常常冠以“有关”二字。

Theoretically the object of administrative accountability at all levels of administrative organs and their civil servants , but primarily liable , directly or indirectly leader leadership responsibility , that all levels of government agencies and various functional departments leadership. In our country at all levels of the relevant laws and regulations of administrative accountability system, the accountability of those responsible in the front , often dubbed the "relevant " word. This generalization of the responsible person designated , makes it difficult to operate . In the specific responsibilities asserted, which is about the "responsible person , which is " irrelevant "responsible person , due unclear responsibilities , difficult to define . , As politicians, often as a stopgap , as the original system, a tool for local fine-tuning , with a strong rule of man . specific features: First, the person directly responsible and indirect responsibility unclear division . occur liability issues , the direct responsibility of the persons better identify and pursue the matter, but it is difficult to determine who is responsible for indirect the second is personal responsibility and collective unclear division of responsibilities . performed by the collective decision-making responsibility for matters of a problem it is difficult to define because the collective decision of the matter is often difficult to define the specific individual responsibility, and it is called &quo