英语论文网

onjunction  was  on  the  border  line  of  these  two  types.  So  in  this  paper,  we  mainly divided explicit cohesion into two types: grammar and lexical.  
.........

CHAPTER THREE   RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ...... 13 
3.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS .... 13 
3.2 RESEARCH METHODS....... 13 
3.3 DATA COLLECTION............ 14
3.4 RESEARCH PROCEDURES ........... 14 
CHAPTER FOUR   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............. 16 
4.1 DIVERSIFIED EXPLICIT COHESIVE DEVICES IN THE REASONING PROCESS..........16 
4.1.1 Explicit Cohesive Characteristics in Confirming Facts of the Case .......... 17 
4.1.2 Explicit Cohesive Characteristics in Tribunal Comments ............. 18 
4.2 IMPLICIT COHESIVE DEVICES STRUCTURE IN THE WHOLE REASONING PROCESS ........ 20 
CHAPTER FIVE   CONCLUSIONS ............ 26 
5.1 MAJOR FINDINGS ............... 26 
5.2 THE LIMITATION OF THE STUDY AND IMPLICATION FOR FUTURE STUDY ... 27 

Chapter Four   Results and Discussion  

This chapter is mainly made up of two parts, targeting at answering the questions we have put forward before. In the first part, the explicit cohesive characteristics will be discussed both in Confirming Facts of the Case and Tribunal Comments. In the second part,  the  implicit  cohesive  characteristics  are  elaborated  in  details.  Meanwhile,  the reason why the explicit and implicit cohesive characteristics between the two parts are different  will  also  be  illustrated  exhaustively.  This  study  has  selected  80  pieces  of arbitration awards to label the cohesion in Confirming Facts of the Case and Tribunal Comments  and  extract  the  data,  through  which  the  explicit  and  implicit  cohesive characteristics  can  be  induced.  In  the  following,  this  study  is  going  to  explore  the reasoning development by analyzing some specific examples according to the data we have got. The detailed data is shown in Table 4.1 .

4.1 Diversified Explicit Cohesive Devices in the Reasoning Process 

The reasoning process is mainly composed of Confirming Facts of the Case and Tribunal  Comments.  According  to  the  Figure  2.5  and  Table  4.1,  we  can  analyze  the cohesive characteristics elaborately. From Table 4.1, it is evident that explicit cohesive devices are various. To begin with grammatical cohesive devices, ellipsis, substitution and coordination take account for 98%, 93% and 85% respectively. In terms of lexical cohesive devices, continuity, transition and casual relationship account for 78%, 75% and 63% respectively. In contrast with them, the percentage of condition, concession, supposition and goal relationship is smaller. From the above data, it is easy to find that grammar devices are used more frequently than lexical devices. Almost all the discourse use  grammar  devices  to  link  sentences.  However,  the  cohesive  character本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。