英语论文网

recommendations with regard to such principles to the Members or to the Security Council or to both."(Charter, Article 11 (201))     The above listed examples show that most regulations are made to stipulate what the participants should do or not do. According to Song Lei,“Passive voice is one outstanding feature of legal English, except contracts which emphasize rights and obligations of the parties involved." (Song Lei&Zhang Shaoquan, 2010: p.132.) So in a sense, the Charter is somewhat similar to a contract which emphasizes the

CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION

In this chapter, the study of the whole paper shall be summarized. Then, some contributions  and  limitations  of  the  analysis  shall be presented.  Finally  some suggestions for further study shall be offered.      This paper is a contrastive study of voice in different legal discourses. The author explores the high frequency of passive voice in the Constitution and the lower frequency of passive voice in the Charter under the theoretical framework of CDA and SFG and come to the following conclusions:

     First, generally  speaking,  passive  voice is  an  outstanding feature of legal discourses. The employment of passive voice makes legal texts more objective and formal. It meets the requirements of such texts.

     Second, the high frequency of passive voice in the Constitution has a close relation with the stylistic features of the Constitution. In addition to the objectivity and formality, the functions of passive voice also can be embodied in transformational system and textual system. Such functions closely relates to the hidden power behind the Constitution.

    Third, the lower frequency of passive voice in the Charter challenges  the conclusion that passive voice is the main feature of legal English. More employment of active voice in the Charter is not determined by language itself but the ideology behind the Charter. The high employment of active voice also proves the fact that the Charter is a weak legislative discourse when compared with the Constitution.

     Four, the present study also concludes that "invisible" power and ideology hidden in legal discourse controlling the selection of voice, and the selection of voice also reflects the power and ideology in the discourse.

5.2 Contributions of the Present Study

The present research has made the following contributions:

First, this paper has broken a new ground in analyzing differences between the international law and national law under the linguistic theoretical framework of CDA and SFG. The voice study combines legal knowledge with linguistic theories. This research method provides a new approach for further study of legal discourses.

Second, more employment of active voice in the Charter challenges the opinion that passive voice is the main feature of all legal discourses. So, when emphasis is put on the obligations and rights of the parties, active voice should take priority. In addition, regarding legal discourse as a whole to study its features is not scientific and a detailed classification and researches are needed.

Third either national law or international law has their own spe本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。