英语论文网

elopers are liable. However, in American and France, the parking garage and parking lot are owned by the owners of residences. In Germany, parking lots are setting as exclusive part, and marked the ranges with sustaining landmark.  These countries prescribe parking garages owned by the proprietors, and of course, the owners should solve the problems themselves which search for insurance companies to gain the damages or undertake the results themselves if they didn’t join insurance.

 

2.2 The analysis about the judicial interpretation concerning the underground parking garages reflects some problems and then reflects the problem of hardness in compensation.

On the contrary, in China, the responsibility could be divided into three parties for the special proprietary institutions. First, according to Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of the Law in Disputes over the Division of Ownership of Buildings   Article 5 “If the developer disposes of parking spaces or parking garages to the owners proportional to the allocation ratio by way of sale, inclusion with the premises, or lease, its act shall be deemed to comply with the provision on “satisfying the requirements of the owners on a priority basis” of the first paragraph of Article 74 of the Property Law.” Therefore, developers possess the parking garages and then, they should undertake the proprietary responsibility .Next, estate managements assume the obligation to repair and manage facilities of the building and they naturally should bear the duty to make compensation to the injuries for their omission according to the contracts or regulations. Though in this case, for some managers, there are not fully accounts or definite and binding rules to do the responsibility. The last, the government are should responsible to the injury for the system of draining off water even they may not pay the real damages.
This institution what we are confronting with exists defects obviously. What called the Division of Ownership of Buildings differentiated the articles belonging but it also take the specific liability into misty. Faced with these disputes, it is difficult to make a satisfied solution as the ambiguous duty taker and the amount of damages. That is what we are taking into consideration for what related to the citizen’s interests closely. 
 Then we should talk about some circumstance about the how the parking garages are owned by the master of the automobile. For the owner of the building, they obtain the fields though selling, leasing complementary by developers on the requirement of “be used to meet the needs of the owners above all else.” Another part are sealed, leased or complemented to residents outside of the building by developers with in the related parties or by owners with in the related pretest, out of related parties or the increased parties. In these cases, for the injuries, whether they could been gained the same treatment.
For the parking garage could gain through convention by paid or free. Certainly these parts could transfer through contract and the gainer could own the garage by many ways such as buying, renting or complement and so on. While some details should be notice: when the owner obtaining the property, some necessary management burden is also inevitable. However, when the transfer of the right of use has happen, the obligee need not pay the expense of management for 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。