英语论文网

sp;omitted.  This  feature  of  disagreement  reminds  us  that,  the  utterance  forms  and  speaking strategies  of  disagreement  speech  acts  not  only  rely  on  face  and  context,  but  also  closely related  to  the  interactional  goals.  Under  different  kinds  of  communicational  contexts,  the expectations of the outcome of accomplish disagreement speech acts are different. According to  the  varied  expectation,  interlocutors  might  choose  different  or  even  totally  contradictory speaking strategies ranking from avoidance to strongly disagreeing. So the rapport orientation for disagreement speech acts should be checked at the first place. 
..........

Conclusion 

This  chapter  will  summarize  the  findings,  providing  a  general  conclusion  of  the  thesis. Features  of  the  refined  taxonomy  will  be  further  developed  and  explained  in  this  part.  The limitations are discussed and suggestions for future research will also be given.The  thesis  stared  from  the  definition  of  disagreement  speech  acts,  and  revealed  the complexity  of  disagreement.  The  complicated  factors  in  disagreement  speech  acts  were considered  multi-directional  in  the  thesis.  There  existed  many  obstacles  in  disagreement’s study lacking of criterion to assess the concept of “polite” in disagreement. Though politeness is  defined  as  “socially  right  and  proper”,  the  evaluation  depends  on  interlocutors’  judgment. The  judgments  made  by  speaker  influenced  by  the  communicational  contexts  and  the interlocution goals for speaker. The two factors related to linguistic, social and cultural factors, like  power  and  distance  between  the  two  interlocutors,  the  expectation,  cost  and  benefit  of making  offence,  and  so  on.  The  thesis  proposes  that  differing  from  many  other  speech  acts, disagreement  is  a  transitional  speech  act.  Speaker  usually  has  the  further  interactional  goals based on the expression of disagreement.  The rapport orientations were introduced to be the standards to indicate the interactions of all the elements. They coordinated three dimensions in disagreement, the face management, the sociality rights and obligations and the interactional goals. Disagreement speech acts have been  divided  into  three  different  orientations,  rapport  maintaining/  enhancing,  rapport neglecting  and  rapport  challenging.  The  head  act  and  additional  act  are  distinguished  to p本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。