英语论文网

摘要：本文是一篇政治留学论文。在研究北约在科索沃的使命的过程中，分析其对世界各地人们的巨大影响,国际法律和国家安全问题已经得到了普遍的关注。这次的研究论文努力探索北约在战争中的细节，分析其合法性,分析北约对科索沃战争的干预。前言当恐怖分子俘虏了一些人，并将他们作为国家的人质，暴力执法或武装部队的闯入对整个国家造成恐惧和浩劫，不适当的处理方法会给人质带来更大的损害或风险。更糟糕的,更不负责任的是进入附近的另一个领域,因为它是更安全的,当前是没有恐怖分子的，随之对居民造成伤害，并破坏对居民有价值的事情。这种方法看起来好像是人质处于极大的风险之中。人们开始担心人质的安全，担心这种操作是否合理,然而正是这种方法的实施，引出了紧随其后的北大西洋公约组织(北约)。

om contemporary war in two ways which include the amalgamation of official and political evaluation into the progression of engaging in warfare and, most notably, the intense decline in fatalities and affliction in war.

Post modern war for humanitarian reasons could turn out to be the acceptable means eventually, but to be expecting it to turn into the norm merely because of its accomplishment in Kosovo is to close the eyes to the restoration of traditional military undertaking, typical nationalism, traditional soldiers and traditional artillery used by the United States and forming global awareness at the turn of the twenty-first century.

In effect, post modern war is still not the standard, and majority of wars in the future may be expected to be lethal ones. Nevertheless, at some point, the perception of war is at the beginning of transformation. In consideration of all the specifics that were purported from various sources, in the face of controversies and varying points of view considering the mission of NATO in Kosovo, it may be asserted that NATO intervention in Kosovo had lain down two major patterns.

First is that the war that happens to the exterior of the state of exemption can and must be carried out for purposes of ethics and principles and not purely strategic concerns. The other suggests that such wars will make both leading players, owing to legal assessment, and adversaries, due to the risk of intervention, more lawfully answerable for their actions. This type of intervention is provided a new set of guidelines stipulated in the “Responsibility to Protect.” More intervention to stop the progress of more abuse to human rights may be imperative and Kosovo presented the world new doctrines by which to accomplish it.

To wrap it up, the NATO intervention had laid the standards that human rights violence has to be stopped and disallowed punishable by law with intense penalties. Those nations with capacity to put off terrorizations causing peril to the rights of people have got to do so. Contemporary warfare should be far more permissible, if executed compliant with deliberated and improved international laws. Intervention is probably not the most acceptable mode but NATO's measures and outcomes of this decision show that, as military intervention progresses to become essential to stop the progress of massive killing and brutality, there is a much preferred means to do it.

As a final word, through the work of Ignatieff (2001), a unique analysis of the disposition and ramifications of NATO's Kosovo mission was elucidated. It is purported and given as a warning that only when people or society has acknowledged the fascinating attributes and disappointments of virtual war, can be truthfully assessed the risks and advantages of strong-minded action. The author provides a well-timed and stimulating insights for not only the politically astute members of society but for all concerned in the interest and wellbeing of future generations who yearn to live in a peaceful and progressive society.

References:

Becker, Richard. The Rambouillet Accord: A declaration of war disguised as a peace agreement. Agenda. 1999. Page 16.

B本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。