Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:51论文论文属性:课程作业 Coursework登出时间:2008-07-23编辑:点击率:7297
论文字数:1096论文编号:org200807230944341815语种:英语 English地区:澳大利亚价格:$ 33
关键词:澳大利亚硕士课程论文australiaassignmentcommon lawCriminal Law
Topic:
Which is the more important phase of the criminal justice process — the investigation or the trial?
During the criminal justice process, we have investigation, prosecution, and adjudication these steps, and the trial is included in adjudication. So we can see Investigation and trial are two quite different process during the criminal justice, and they have two quite different use. During this paper the writer will introduce the define and how to work of them.
As in France and Spain , or on the state’s attorney, as in West Germany , investigation is in all procedural systems a function of the police as well as the law often confers investigatory authority on a magistrate in criminal matters. These officials regularly delegate routine matters to police or other nonlegal personnel but retain the right to investigate important or sensitive cases. Express judicial authorization of acts interfering with the liberty or privacy of citizens is required in all systems, but exceptions for urgent cases are provided with carrying liberality.
Pretrial detention can be ordered only by a magistrate . No judicial warrant is necessary, however, for arrest and brief detention by the police if the suspect is apprehended while committing the crime or shortly thereafter, or under circumstances creating strong suspicion. In West Germany, the police can arrest and detain a suspect for up to forty-eight hours if there is good reason to believe that he might flee or destroy evidence. Searches and seizures must on principle be ordered by a magistrate, but they can be conducted without such authorization if required by exigent circumstances . Standards of suspicion authorizing police to conduct searches and to make arrests tend to be somewhat lower in civil law countries than the exacting probable cause requirement imposed by American law. Because the law accords the individual less extensive protection against invasions of his privacy in the course of a criminal investigation, and everywhere citizens need protection from overzealous police. The conflict between law enforcement and the individual’s privacy does not lend itself to simple solutions, since both interests are valued highly in free societies. American law has adopted an indirect approach designed to give maximum protection to the individual. Evidence obtained in violation of the suspect’s rights cannot be used in court to support a conviction . Proponents of that rule, assuming that police have a professional interest in the conviction of criminals, expect it to have a deterrent effect on illegal police behavior. In other systems, comparable but less sweeping rules apply. Because indirect control of the police through the exclusion of tainted evidence is severely limited in civil law countries, one would expect to find other control mechanisms. Such alternatives exist, but their practical efficacy is questionable, to say the least. The criminal and civil liability of police officers may check outright brutality, but it provides only a fragmentary and notoriously ineffectual remedy for violations of procedural law.
The latter method has not gained much practical importance as a check on police misconduct in the countries whose statutes make it available. This is hardly surprising, since formal disciplinary proceedings, especially if initiated by an external agency, appear dis本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。