Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2011-04-11编辑:zn1987点击率:3643
论文字数:3186论文编号:org201104111326562129语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:$ 66
关键词:Corporate insolvencyJerseyMinority shareholders
B. WILSON
Wilson was a minority shareholder (30%) in a company formed with another shareholder (Shaw) whoheld the remaining shares. Wilson petitioned for relief under section 459, making several allegationsof unfairly prejudicial conduct. These included Shaw's unilateral payment of company funds to another company in which his son was interested; the levying on the company of managementcharges (in excess of £200,000) payable to other companies in which Shaw was interested, wherethe company derived no benefit; and the failure to hold annual general meetings. At first instance thesheriff found that the affairs of the company had been conducted in an unfairly prejudicial manner andordered that Shaw purchase Wilson's shares.12This decision was upheld by the First Division onappeal.13Several days were allotted for the further appeal to the House of Lords,14but in the eventonly a few hours were needed. The main point argument for the appellant was that the managementcharges were not unfairly prejudicial because Wilson had previously consented to similar payments.In rejecting the appeal, Lords Hoffmann and Hope (delivering the only reasoned opinions, with whichLords Rodger, Walker and Carswell agreed) expressed surprise that the case had reached theHouse. Lord Hope emphasised that the limits on the right of appeal to the House of Lords must be“carefully and jealously respected”,15particularly the restriction to questions of law and therequirement to give a proper estimate of the time needed. Lord Hope was not satisfied that counselhad given proper attention to these matters.
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。